Literature DB >> 11544788

Morphological parameters as predictors of successful correction of Class III malocclusion.

A Zentner1, G M Doll, S M Peylo.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess pre-treatment cephalometric parameters and measurements of the size of the apical bases as predictors of successful orthodontic correction of Class III malocclusions. Pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms and study models of 80 completed Class III subjects were examined to obtain 23 cephalometric parameters taken mainly from the analyses of McNamara and Schwarz, and to measure the size of the apical bases. Success of occlusal correction was evaluated as the percentage change of peer assessment rating score during treatment, which was used as the dependent variable in multivariate statistical analyses testing the predictive value of the parameters assessed. No improvement in the Class III skeletal pattern occurred during treatment and the treatment effects were confined to dentoalveolar changes. With the exception of the percentage midfacial length/mandibular length ratio, the net sum of maxillary and mandibular length differences, the mandibular ramus height/mandibular body length ratio and the gonion angle, most cephalometric parameters of pre-treatment craniofacial morphology assessed were poor predictors of successful correction of Class III malocclusions. Assessment of the size relationship of the maxillary and mandibular apical bases was the strongest predictor of occlusal correction achieved and may serve as a valuable diagnostic addition in the prediction of successful treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11544788     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/23.4.383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  4 in total

1.  Cephalometric variables used to predict the success of interceptive treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and face mask. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Daniele Nóbrega Nardoni; Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

2.  Compensation of skeletal Class III malocclusion by isolated extraction of mandibular teeth: Part 2: Skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue parameters in comparison with nonextraction Class III therapies.

Authors:  Bernd Zimmer; Sarah Gaida; Henning Dathe
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Retrospective 25-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in Angle Class III patients : Success versus failure.

Authors:  Brigitte Wendl; A Kamenica; H Droschl; N Jakse; F Weiland; T Wendl; M Wendl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 4.  Treatment Options for Class III Malocclusion in Growing Patients with Emphasis on Maxillary Protraction.

Authors:  Zeinab Azamian; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2016-04-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.