Literature DB >> 11544060

The reliability of kinetic and kinematic variables used to analyse normal running gait.

C E Diss1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of 24 kinetic and kinematic variables from three synchronized systems used to represent normal running gait. Five male runners (mean 23.4 years, mass 80.2 kg) ran down a runway at a constant velocity (3.5-4.0 m/s). This was repeated until 10 acceptable trials had been performed which was then repeated 7 days later. The mean of the 10 trials was used for kinetic analysis and the mean of 5 trials for the kinematics. All of the kinematic variables achieved a reliability greater than 0.93. The 6 variables that were able to demonstrate a high reliability (>0.94) from a single trial came from all systems. This suggests that variables and systems used to collect and analyse gait should be assessed for their reliability using the population to be studied before actual data collection.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11544060     DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00125-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  12 in total

Review 1.  Walking and running on treadmill: the standard criteria for kinematics studies.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Karim Chamari; Luca Paolo Ardigò
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-07-14

2.  Knee kinematics and kinetics during gait, step and hop in males with a 16 years old ACL injury compared with matched controls.

Authors:  A von Porat; M Henriksson; E Holmström; C A Thorstensson; L Mattsson; E M Roos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Energetics and mechanics of running men: the influence of body mass.

Authors:  Paolo Taboga; Stefano Lazzer; Rezene Fessehatsion; Fiorenza Agosti; Alessandro Sartorio; Pietro E di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes.

Authors:  Donald L Goss; Michael Lewek; Bing Yu; William B Ware; Deydre S Teyhen; Michael T Gross
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal plane motion.

Authors:  Vivienne H Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Jogging kinematics after lumbar paraspinal muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Joseph M Hart; D Casey Kerrigan; Julie M Fritz; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Gait modification strategies of trunk over left stance phase in patients with right anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Dongliang Shi; Nannan Li; Yubin Wang; Shuyun Jiang; Jinglong Li; Wenhui Zhu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

8.  Knee kinematics and kinetics in former soccer players with a 16-year-old ACL injury--the effects of twelve weeks of knee-specific training.

Authors:  Anette von Porat; Marketta Henriksson; Eva Holmström; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The feasibility of a modified shoe for multi-segment foot motion analysis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J Halstead; A M Keenan; G J Chapman; A C Redmond
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  The effect of minimalist footwear and instruction on running: an observational study.

Authors:  Massimo Giuseppe Barcellona; Linda Buckley; Lisa J M Palmer; Roisin M Ormond; Gwawr Owen; Daniel J Watson; Roger Woledge; Di Newham
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2017-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.