Literature DB >> 11543714

Colonization and persistence of rough and smooth colony variants of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in the mouths of rats.

D H Fine1, P Goncharoff, H Schreiner, K M Chang, D Furgang, D Figurski.   

Abstract

Fresh isolates of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) bind avidly to surfaces in vitro, but existing in vivo studies of the adherence of Aa are limited. This study had two goals: (1) to compare the oral colonization of two isogenic strains of Aa-CU1010, a clinical isolate that expresses the adherent phenotype, and CU1012, a minimally adherent laboratory variant-and (2) to check for phenotypic reversion of these strains in a clinical setting. Rifampicin-resistant strains, developed for tracking in Sprague-Dawley rats, were tested in vitro to determine their stability and binding. In study 1, after antibiotic suppression, six rats (group I) received CU1010 in their feed. The eight rats in group II received CU1012 in their feed and four were supplemented by oral swabbing and four by gastric gavage. Group III consisted of three sham-inoculated controls. All rats were inoculated for 4 days. Microbiological data were collected at 1, 4 and 8 weeks after inoculation. Supporting data were supplied by antibody titres and clinical measures of alveolar bone loss. Study 2 consisted of six rats in each of three groups as above, but tagged strains of Aa were delivered by food alone. At all time-points in both studies, Aa was absent before inoculation and controls had no Aa or antibody to Aa. In study 1, all six rats in group I yielded positive cultures for Aa at 8 weeks. In group II, five of eight had positive cultures for Aa at 1 week, two of eight at 4 weeks and none had Aa at 8 weeks (P < or =0.001). All six rats in group I had serum anti-Aa titres compared to group II, where titres were seen in four of eight rats (P < or =0.015). In vitro data paralleled those found in vivo. No phenotypic reversion of either strain was seen in vivo. In study 2, four of six rats in group I showed Aa and had titres to Aa, while no other animals showed Aa at any time. The model provides convincing evidence that, unlike laboratory variants, clinical isolates colonize, persist and integrate into an already established, albeit reduced, econiche.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11543714     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00067-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  24 in total

1.  Population structure and genetic diversity of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strains isolated from localized juvenile periodontitis patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Kaplan; Helen C Schreiner; David Furgang; Daniel H Fine
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Animal models to study host-bacteria interactions involved in periodontitis.

Authors:  Dana T Graves; Jun Kang; Oelisoa Andriankaja; Keisuke Wada; Carlos Rossa
Journal:  Front Oral Biol       Date:  2011-11-11

3.  Detachment of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans biofilm cells by an endogenous beta-hexosaminidase activity.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Kaplan; Chandran Ragunath; Narayanan Ramasubbu; Daniel H Fine
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A.actinomycetemcomitans-induced periodontal disease promotes systemic and local responses in rat periodontium.

Authors:  Beatriz de Brito Bezerra; Oelisoa Andriankaja; Jun Kang; Sandra Pacios; Hyung Jin Bae; Yu Li; Vincent Tsiagbe; Helen Schreiner; Daniel H Fine; Dana T Graves
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 8.728

5.  Omega-3 fatty acid effect on alveolar bone loss in rats.

Authors:  L Kesavalu; B Vasudevan; B Raghu; E Browning; D Dawson; J M Novak; M C Correll; M J Steffen; A Bhattacharya; G Fernandes; J L Ebersole
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Development of an animal model for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilm-mediated oral osteolytic infection: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Marcelo O Freire; Parish P Sedghizadeh; Christoph Schaudinn; Amita Gorur; Jennifer S Downey; Jeong-Ho Choi; Weizhen Chen; Joong-Ki Kook; Casey Chen; Steven D Goodman; Homayoun H Zadeh
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Rat model of polymicrobial infection, immunity, and alveolar bone resorption in periodontal disease.

Authors:  Lakshmyya Kesavalu; Sabapathi Sathishkumar; Vasudevan Bakthavatchalu; Chad Matthews; Dolph Dawson; Michelle Steffen; Jeffrey L Ebersole
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Genes involved in the synthesis and degradation of matrix polysaccharide in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biofilms.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Kaplan; Kabilan Velliyagounder; Chandran Ragunath; Holger Rohde; Dietrich Mack; Johannes K-M Knobloch; Narayanan Ramasubbu
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  In vivo beta-defensin gene expression in rat gingival epithelium in response to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans infection.

Authors:  A R Kurland; H Schreiner; G Diamond
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.419

10.  Colonization and Persistence of Labeled and "Foreign" Strains of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans Inoculated into the Mouths of Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Daniel H Fine; Maribasappa Karched; David Furgang; Vandana Sampathkumar; Senthil Velusamy; Dipti Godboley
Journal:  J Oral Biol (Northborough)       Date:  2015-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.