Literature DB >> 11541638

Comparison of treatment strategies for Space Motion Sickness.

J R Davis1, R T Jennings, B G Beck.   

Abstract

Treatment strategies for Space Motion Sickness (SMS) were compared using the results of postflight oral debriefings. Standardized questionnaires were administered to all crewmembers immediately following Space Shuttle flights by NASA flight surgeons. Cases of SMS were graded as mild, moderate, or severe based on published criteria, and medication effectiveness was judged based on subjective reports of symptom relief. Since October 1989, medication effectiveness is reported inflight through Private Medical Conferences with the crew. A symptom matrix was analyzed for 19 crewmembers treated with oral combination of scopolamine and dextroamphetamine (scopdex) and 15 crewmembers treated with promethazine delivered by intramuscular i.m. or suppository routes. Scopdex has been given preflight as prophylaxis for SMS, but analysis showed delayed symptom presentation in 9 crewmembers or failed to prevent symptoms in 7. Only 3 crewmembers who took scopdex had no symptoms inflight. Fourteen out of 15 crewmembers treated with i.m. promethazine and 6 of 8 treated with promethazine suppositories after symptom development had immediate (within 1-2 h) symptom relief and required no additional medication. There were no cases of delayed symptom presentation in the crewmembers treated with promethazine. This response is in contrast to untreated crewmembers who typically have slow symptom resolution over 72-96 h. We conclude that promethazine is an effective treatment of SMS symptoms inflight. NASA policy currently recommends treating crewmembers with SMS after symptom development, and no longer recommends prophylaxis with scopdex due to delayed symptom development and apparent variable absorption of oral medications during early flight days.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 11541638     DOI: 10.1016/0094-5765(93)90074-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Astronaut        ISSN: 0094-5765            Impact factor:   2.413


  6 in total

Review 1.  Space motion sickness.

Authors:  James R Lackner; Paul Dizio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Impact of Oral Promethazine on Human Whole-Body Motion Perceptual Thresholds.

Authors:  Ana Diaz-Artiles; Adrian J Priesol; Torin K Clark; David P Sherwood; Charles M Oman; Laurence R Young; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-24

3.  Binocular misalignments elicited by altered gravity provide evidence for nonlinear central compensation.

Authors:  Kara H Beaton; W Cary Huffman; Michael C Schubert
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 4.  The Future of Personalized Medicine in Space: From Observations to Countermeasures.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pavez Loriè; Sarah Baatout; Alexander Choukér; Judith-Irina Buchheim; Bjorn Baselet; Cinzia Dello Russo; Virginia Wotring; Monica Monici; Lucia Morbidelli; Dimitri Gagliardi; Julia Caroline Stingl; Leonardo Surdo; Vincent Lai Ming Yip
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-13

5.  Stability Studies of UV Laser Irradiated Promethazine and Thioridazine after Exposure to Hypergravity Conditions.

Authors:  Ágota Simon; Tatiana Tozar; Adriana Smarandache; Mihai Boni; Alexandru Stoicu; Alan Dowson; Jack J W A van Loon; Mihail Lucian Pascu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Physiological adaptations affecting drug pharmacokinetics in space: what do we really know? A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Cinzia Dello Russo; Tiziano Bandiera; Monica Monici; Leonardo Surdo; Vincent Lai Ming Yip; Virginia Wotring; Lucia Morbidelli
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 9.473

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.