Literature DB >> 11541124

Induction and ionic basis of slow wave potentials in seedlings of Pisum sativum L.

R Stahlberg1, D J Cosgrove.   

Abstract

Slow wave potentials (SWPs) are transient depolarizations which propagate substantial distances from their point of origin. They were induced in the epidermal cells of pea epicotyls by injurious methods such as root excision and heat treatment, as well as by externally applied defined steps in xylem pressure (Px) in the absence of wounding. The common principle of induction was a rapid increase in Px. Such a stimulus appeared under natural conditions after (i) bending of the epicotyl, (ii) wounding of the epidermis, (iii) rewatering of dehydrated roots, and (iv) embolism. The induced depolarization was not associated with a change in cell input resistance. This result and the ineffectiveness of ion channel blockers point to H(+)-pumps rather than ion channels as the ionic basis of the SWP. Stimuli such as excision, heat treatment and pressure steps, which generate SWPs, caused a transient increase in the fluorescence intensity of epicotyls loaded with the pH-indicator DM-NERF, a 2',7'-dimethyl derivative of rhodol, but not of those loaded with the pH indicator 2',7'bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF). Matching kinetics of depolarization and pH response identify a transient inactivation of proton pumps in the plasma membrane as the causal mechanism of the SWP. Feeding pump inhibitors to the cut surface of excised epicotyls failed to chemically simulate a SWP; cyanide, azide and 2,4-dinitrophenol caused sustained, local depolarizations which did not propagate. Of all tested substances, only sodium cholate caused a transient and propagating depolarization whose arrival in the growing region of the epicotyl coincided with a transient growth rate reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 11541124     DOI: 10.1007/bf00231397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of electric and growth responses to excision in cucumber and pea seedlings. I. Short-distance effects are a result of wounding.

Authors:  R Stahlberg; D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 7.228

2.  Comparison of electric and growth responses to excision in cucumber and pea seedlings. II. Long-distance effects are caused by the release of xylem pressure.

Authors:  R Stahlberg; D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 7.228

3.  Osmotic Shock Inhibits Auxin-stimulated Acidification and Growth.

Authors:  B Rubinstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Regulation of H Excretion : EFFECTS OF OSMOTIC SHOCK.

Authors:  B Rubinstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  "Metabolic" action potentials in Acetabularia.

Authors:  D Gradmann
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1976-10-20       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Rapid Suppression of Growth by Blue Light: OCCURRENCE, TIME COURSE, AND GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS.

Authors:  D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 7.  The excitability of plant cells: with a special emphasis on characean internodal cells.

Authors:  R Wayne
Journal:  Bot Rev       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.083

8.  Transient Cl- and K+ Currents during the Action Potential in Chara inflata (Effects of External Sorbitol, Cations, and Ion Channel Blockers).

Authors:  J. I. Kourie
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  The action potential of Dionaea muscipula Ellis.

Authors:  D Hodick; A Sievers
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  Bioelectric potential changes in the style of Lilium longiflorum Thunb. after self- and cross-pollination of the stigma.

Authors:  A W Spanjers
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.116

View more
  10 in total

1.  Variation potential in higher plants: Mechanisms of generation and propagation.

Authors:  Vladimir Vodeneev; Elena Akinchits; Vladimir Sukhov
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2015

2.  Simulation of variation potential in higher plant cells.

Authors:  Vladimir Sukhov; Elena Akinchits; Lyubov Katicheva; Vladimir Vodeneev
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Herbivore-Triggered Electrophysiological Reactions: Candidates for Systemic Signals in Higher Plants and the Challenge of Their Identification.

Authors:  Matthias R Zimmermann; Axel Mithöfer; Torsten Will; Hubert H Felle; Alexandra C U Furch
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Wound-Induced Systemic Responses and Their Coordination by Electrical Signals.

Authors:  Kyounghee Lee; Pil Joon Seo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Decrement and amplification of slow wave potentials during their propagation in Helianthus annuus L. shoots.

Authors:  Rainer Stahlberg; Robert E Cleland; Elizabeth Van Volkenburgh
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Shade-Induced Action Potentials in Helianthus annuus L. Originate Primarily from the Epicotyl.

Authors:  Rainer Stahlberg; Nicholas R Stephens; Robert E Cleland; Elizabeth Van Volkenburgh
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2006-01

7.  Changes in extracellular pH are neither required nor sufficient for activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in response to systemin and fusicoccin in tomato.

Authors:  Rebecca Higgins; Thomas Lockwood; Susan Holley; Roopa Yalamanchili; Johannes W Stratmann
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Changes in H(+)-ATP Synthase Activity, Proton Electrochemical Gradient, and pH in Pea Chloroplast Can Be Connected with Variation Potential.

Authors:  Vladimir Sukhov; Lyubov Surova; Ekaterina Morozova; Oksana Sherstneva; Vladimir Vodeneev
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Arabidopsis H+-ATPase AHA1 controls slow wave potential duration and wound-response jasmonate pathway activation.

Authors:  Archana Kumari; Aurore Chételat; Chi Tam Nguyen; Edward E Farmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Insect-damaged Arabidopsis moves like wounded Mimosa pudica.

Authors:  Andrzej Kurenda; Chi Tam Nguyen; Aurore Chételat; Stéphanie Stolz; Edward E Farmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.