Literature DB >> 11540416

Space flight and the skeleton: lessons for the earthbound.

D D Bikle1, B P Halloran, E Morey-Holton.   

Abstract

Loss of bone during extended space flight has long been a concern that could limit the ability of humans to explore the universe. Surprisingly, the available data do not support the concept that weightlessness leads inexorably to a depleted skeleton unable to withstand the stress of a return to a 1-g environment. Nevertheless, some bone loss does occur, especially in those bones most stressed by gravity prior to flight, which provides confirmation of the proposal formulated over a century ago by Julius Wolff that mechanical stress determines the form and function of bone. Although the phenomenon of bone loss with skeletal unloading, whether by space flight or immobilization or just taking a load off your feet (literally) is well established, the mechanisms by which bone senses load and adjusts to it are not so clear. What actually is the stimulus, and what are the sensors? What are the target cells? How do the sensors communicate the message into the cells, and by what pathways do the cells respond? What is the role of endocrine, factors vs. paracrine or autocrine factors in mediating or modulating the response? None of these questions has been answered with certainty, but, as will become apparent in this review, we have some clues directing us to the answers. Although the focus of this review concerns space flight, it seems highly likely that the mechanisms mediating the transmission of mechanical load to changes in bone formation and resorption apply equally well to all forms of disuse osteoporosis and are likely to be the same mechanisms affected by other etiologies of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Center ARC; NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 11540416     DOI: 10.1097/00019616-199707010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrinologist        ISSN: 1051-2144


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical factors and bone health: effects of weightlessness and neurologic injury.

Authors:  Shreyasee Amin
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Soybean isoflavones preserve bone mass in hindlimb-unloaded mice.

Authors:  Fumie Sugiyama; Jian Wu; Maiko Fujioka; Junko Ezaki; Ken Takeda; Chisato Miyaura; Tatsuya Ishida; Kazuhiko Yamada; Yoshiko Ishimi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Aggravation of inflammatory response by costimulation with titanium particles and mechanical perturbations in osteoblast- and macrophage-like cells.

Authors:  Heon Goo Lee; Anny Hsu; Hana Goto; Saqib Nizami; Jonathan H Lee; Edwin R Cadet; Peter Tang; Roya Shaji; Chandhanarat Chandhanayinyong; Seok Hyun Kweon; Daniel S Oh; Hesham Tawfeek; Francis Y Lee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 4.249

4.  Nuclear factor of activated T cells mediates fluid shear stress- and tensile strain-induced Cox2 in human and murine bone cells.

Authors:  Ayse B Celil Aydemir; Hiroshi Minematsu; Thomas R Gardner; Kyung Ok Kim; Jae Mok Ahn; Francis Young-In Lee
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Experimental model of osteoporosis: comparison between ovariectomy and botulinum toxin a.

Authors:  Halil Atmaca; Adem Aydın; Resul Musaoğlu
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.