Literature DB >> 11539726

Wall relaxation in growing stems: comparison of four species and assessment of measurement techniques.

D J Cosgrove1.   

Abstract

This study was carried out to develop improved methods for measuring in-vivo stress relaxation of growing tissues and to compare relaxation in the stems of four different species. When water uptake by growing tissue is prevented, in-vivo stress relaxation occurs because continued wall loosening reduces wall stress and cell turgor pressure. With this procedure one may measure the yield threshold for growth (Y), the turgor pressure in excess of the yield threshold (P-Y), and the physiological wall extensibility (phi). Three relaxation techniques proved useful: "turgor-relaxation", "balance-pressure" and "pressure-block". In the turgor-relaxation method, water is withheld from growing tissue and the reduction in turgor is measured directly with the pressure probe. This technique gives absolute values for P and Y, but requires tissue excision. In the balance-pressure technique, the excised growing region is sealed in a pressure chamber, and the subsequent reduction in water potential is measured as the applied pressure needed to return xylem sap to the cut surface. This method is simple, but only measures (P-Y), not the individual values of P and Y. In the pressure-block technique, the growing tissue is sealed into a pressure chamber, growth is monitored continuously, and just sufficient pressure is applied to the chamber to block growth. The method gives high-resolution kinetics of relaxation and does not require tissue excision, but only measures (P-Y). The three methods gave similar results when applied to the growing stems of pea (Pisum sativum L.), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and zucchini (Curcubita pepo L.) seedlings. Values for (P-Y) averaged between 1.4 and 2.7 bar, depending on species. Yield thresholds averaged between 1.3 and 3.0 bar. Compared with the other methods, relaxation by pressure-block was faster and exhibited dynamic changes in wall-yielding properties. The two pressure-chamber methods were also used to measure the internal water-potential gradient (between the xylem and the epidermis) which drives water uptake for growth. For the four species it was small, between 0.3 and 0.6 bar, and so did not limit growth substantially.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Number 40-30; NASA Discipline Plant Biology; NASA Program Space Biology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 11539726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  26 in total

Review 1.  How do plant cell walls extend?

Authors:  D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Physical basis for altered stem elongation rates in internode length mutants of Pisum.

Authors:  F J Behringer; D J Cosgrove; J B Reid; P J Davies
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Photoinhibition of stem elongation by blue and red light: effects on hydraulic and cell wall properties.

Authors:  J Kigel; D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Expansin mode of action on cell walls. Analysis of wall hydrolysis, stress relaxation, and binding.

Authors:  S J McQueen-Mason; D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Growth inhibition, turgor maintenance, and changes in yield threshold after cessation of solute import in pea epicotyls.

Authors:  J G Schmalstig; D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Rapid alterations in growth rate and electrical potentials upon stem excision in pea seedlings.

Authors:  R Stahlberg; D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Chemically mediated mechanical expansion of the pollen tube cell wall.

Authors:  Enrique R Rojas; Scott Hotton; Jacques Dumais
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Plant cell growth in tissue.

Authors:  Joseph K E Ortega
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Rapid Changes in Cell Wall Yielding of Elongating Begonia argenteo-guttata L. Leaves in Response to Changes in Plant Water Status.

Authors:  M D Serpe; M A Matthews
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Profile of Daniel J. Cosgrove.

Authors:  Tinsley H Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.