Literature DB >> 11539204

Calibrating the Ordovician Radiation of marine life: implications for Phanerozoic diversity trends.

A I Miller1, M Foote.   

Abstract

It has long been suspected that trends in global marine biodiversity calibrated for the Phanerozoic may be affected by sampling problems. However, this possibility has not been evaluated definitively, and raw diversity trends are generally accepted at face value in macroevolutionary investigations. Here, we analyze a global-scale sample of fossil occurrences that allows us to determine directly the effects of sample size on the calibration of what is generally thought to be among the most significant global biodiversity increases in the history of life: the Ordovician Radiation. Utilizing a composite database that includes trilobites, brachiopods, and three classes of molluscs, we conduct rarefaction analyses to demonstrate that the diversification trajectory for the Radiation was considerably different than suggested by raw diversity time-series. Our analyses suggest that a substantial portion of the increase recognized in raw diversity depictions for the last three Ordovician epochs (the Llandeilian, Caradocian, and Ashgillian) is a consequence of increased sample size of the preserved and catalogued fossil record. We also use biometric data for a global sample of Ordovician trilobites, along with methods of measuring morphological diversity that are not biased by sample size, to show that morphological diversification in this major clade had leveled off by the Llanvirnian. The discordance between raw diversity depictions and more robust taxonomic and morphological diversity metrics suggests that sampling effects may strongly influence our perception of biodiversity trends throughout the Phanerozoic.

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Exobiology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 11539204     DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373-22.2.304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paleobiology        ISSN: 0094-8373            Impact factor:   2.892


  19 in total

1.  Effects of sampling standardization on estimates of Phanerozoic marine diversification.

Authors:  J Alroy; C R Marshall; R K Bambach; K Bezusko; M Foote; F T Fursich; T A Hansen; S M Holland; L C Ivany; D Jablonski; D K Jacobs; D C Jones; M A Kosnik; S Lidgard; S Low; A I Miller; P M Novack-Gottshall; T D Olszewski; M E Patzkowsky; D M Raup; K Roy; J J Sepkoski; M G Sommers; P J Wagner; A Webber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Random walks in the history of life.

Authors:  James L Cornette; Bruce S Lieberman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rapid recovery from the Late Ordovician mass extinction.

Authors:  A Z Krug; M E Patzkowsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effects of taxonomic standardization on sampling-standardized estimates of historical diversity.

Authors:  Peter J Wagner; Martin Aberhan; Austin Hendy; Wolfgang Kiessling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Flat latitudinal diversity gradient caused by the Permian-Triassic mass extinction.

Authors:  Haijun Song; Shan Huang; Enhao Jia; Xu Dai; Paul B Wignall; Alexander M Dunhill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Decoupled evolution of soft and hard substrate communities during the Cambrian Explosion and Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event.

Authors:  Luis A Buatois; Maria G Mángano; Ricardo A Olea; Mark A Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Pulse of atmospheric oxygen during the late Cambrian.

Authors:  Matthew R Saltzman; Seth A Young; Lee R Kump; Benjamin C Gill; Timothy W Lyons; Bruce Runnegar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Loss of speciation rate will impoverish future diversity.

Authors:  M L Rosenzweig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Diversity dynamics of marine planktonic diatoms across the Cenozoic.

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky; Ulf Sorhannus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Spatial bias in the marine fossil record.

Authors:  Daril A Vilhena; Andrew B Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.