Literature DB >> 11538917

Calf venous compliance measured with head-up tilt equals supine calf compliance.

D E Watenpaugh1, R E Ballard, G A Breit, E M Bernauer, C G Blomqvist, A R Hargens.   

Abstract

Elevated calf compliance may contribute to orthostatic intolerance following space flight and bed rest. Calf venous compliance is measured conventionally with venous occulusion plethysmography in supine subjects. With this well-established technique, subjects undergo inflation of a pressure cuff around the thigh just above the knee, which increases calf venous pressure. A plethysmograph simultaneously measures calf volume elevation. Compliance equals calf volume elevation per mm Hg thigh occlusion (calf venous) pressure in relaxed legs of the supine subjects. Compliance may also be measured during stepwise head-up tilt (HUT) as calf volume elevation per mm Hg gravitational venous pressure elevation produced by HUT. However, during HUT on a tilt table with a footplate, calf muscles activate to counteract gravity: this is an obvious and natural response to gravitational force. Such muscle activation conceivably could reduce calf compliance, yet relatively little calf muscle activation occurs during HUT and orthostasis (<10% of maximal voluntary levels). Also, this activation produces minimal calf volume change (<0.3%). Therefore, we hypothesized that calf compliance measured with HUT equals that measured with supine venous occlusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Center ARC; NASA Discipline Cardiopulmonary; NASA Discipline Number 00-00; NASA Discipline Number 14-10; NASA Program Flight; NASA Program Space Physiology and Countermeasures; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 11538917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gravit Physiol        ISSN: 1077-9248


  2 in total

1.  Alterations of calf venous and arterial compliance following acclimation to heat administered at a fixed daily time in humans.

Authors:  Megumi Maruyama; Toshiko Hara; Michio Hashimoto; Miki Koga; Osamu Shido
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 2.  Adaptation to microgravity, deconditioning, and countermeasures.

Authors:  Kunihiko Tanaka; Naoki Nishimura; Yasuaki Kawai
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.781

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.