Literature DB >> 11538227

Evolution of a steam atmosphere during Earth's accretion.

K J Zahnle1, J F Kasting, J B Pollack.   

Abstract

We have modeled the evolution of an impact-generated steam atmosphere surrounding an accreting Earth. The model assumes Safronov accretion; it includes degassing of planetesimals upon impact, thermal blanketing by a steam atmosphere, interchange of water between the surface and the interior, shock heating and convective cooling of Earth's interior, and hydrogen escape, both by a solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) powered planetary wind and by impact erosion (atmospheric cratering). The model does not include atmophiles other than water, chemical reaction of water with metallic iron, core formation, compression, and spatial and temporal inhomogeneity of accretion. If the incoming planetesimals were too dry or the EUV flux too high, very little water would accumulate at the surface. Essentially all water retained by such a planet would be through rehydration of silicates. If rehydration were inefficient, very little water would be retained in any form. Degassing of wetter planetesimals produces a steam atmosphere over a magma ocean, the energy of accretion being sufficient to maintain a runaway greenhouse atmosphere. The mass of the atmosphere is limited by water's solubility in the (partial) melt. This type of solution is produced for a wide range of model parameters. During accretion, approximately 30 bars of water could have kept the surface at 1500 degrees K. As the accretional energy input declined below the runaway greenhouse threshold, the steam atmosphere rained out. Outgassing of dissolved water at the close of accretion is quantitatively important. These models can leave from approximately 100 to more than 300 bars of water at the surface at the close of accretion. In general, most of the water accreted remains dissolved in the mantle. H2 could have escaped as rapidly as it formed only if the planetesimals were relatively dry. Consequently H2 should have accumulated until it reached chemical equilibrium with water vapor. Impact erosion (escape caused by impact) is a critical but poorly understood process. It can prevent the accumulation of a steam atmosphere if the planetesimals are sufficiently dry, or for wetter impactors if it is much more effective than we have assumed. Impact erosion of a steam atmosphere is less important; it is equivalent to a slightly drier rain of impactors. If a hypothetical Moon-forming impact took place before the collapse of the runaway greenhouse, relatively little water (approximately 30-100 bars) would have been in the atmosphere; hence little could have been lost. If the event took place later, the potential damage could have been greater.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Exobiology; NASA Discipline Number 52-40; NASA Program Exobiology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 11538227     DOI: 10.1016/0019-1035(88)90031-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Icarus        ISSN: 0019-1035            Impact factor:   3.508


  14 in total

1.  Pathways to Earth-like atmospheres. Extreme ultraviolet (EUV)-powered escape of hydrogen-rich protoatmospheres.

Authors:  Helmut Lammer; K G Kislyakova; P Odert; M Leitzinger; R Schwarz; E Pilat-Lohinger; Yu N Kulikov; M L Khodachenko; M Güdel; M Hanslmeier
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 2.  Earth's earliest atmospheres.

Authors:  Kevin Zahnle; Laura Schaefer; Bruce Fegley
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Palaeoclimates: the first two billion years.

Authors:  James F Kasting; Shuhei Ono
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Emergence of two types of terrestrial planet on solidification of magma ocean.

Authors:  Keiko Hamano; Yutaka Abe; Hidenori Genda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Planetary science: Evolutionary dichotomy for rocky planets.

Authors:  Linda T Elkins-Tanton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  XUV-exposed, non-hydrostatic hydrogen-rich upper atmospheres of terrestrial planets. Part I: atmospheric expansion and thermal escape.

Authors:  Nikolai V Erkaev; Helmut Lammer; Petra Odert; Yuri N Kulikov; Kristina G Kislyakova; Maxim L Khodachenko; Manuel Güdel; Arnold Hanslmeier; Helfried Biernat
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  AstRoMap European Astrobiology Roadmap.

Authors:  Gerda Horneck; Nicolas Walter; Frances Westall; John Lee Grenfell; William F Martin; Felipe Gomez; Stefan Leuko; Natuschka Lee; Silvano Onofri; Kleomenis Tsiganis; Raffaele Saladino; Elke Pilat-Lohinger; Ernesto Palomba; Jesse Harrison; Fernando Rull; Christian Muller; Giovanni Strazzulla; John R Brucato; Petra Rettberg; Maria Teresa Capria
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Extreme water loss and abiotic O2 buildup on planets throughout the habitable zones of M dwarfs.

Authors:  R Luger; R Barnes
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Framework for Their Assessment.

Authors:  David C Catling; Joshua Krissansen-Totton; Nancy Y Kiang; David Crisp; Tyler D Robinson; Shiladitya DasSarma; Andrew J Rushby; Anthony Del Genio; William Bains; Shawn Domagal-Goldman
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Atmospheric Prebiotic Chemistry and Organic Hazes.

Authors:  Melissa G Trainer
Journal:  Curr Org Chem       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.180

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.