Literature DB >> 11536900

Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record.

M Foote1, J J Sepkoski.   

Abstract

Measuring the completeness of the fossil record is essential to understanding evolution over long timescales, particularly when comparing evolutionary patterns among biological groups with different preservational properties. Completeness measures have been presented for various groups based on gaps in the stratigraphic ranges of fossil taxa and on hypothetical lineages implied by estimated evolutionary trees. Here we present and compare quantitative, widely applicable absolute measures of completeness at two taxonomic levels for a broader sample of higher taxa of marine animals than has previously been available. We provide an estimate of the probability of genus preservation per stratigraphic interval, and determine the proportion of living families with some fossil record. The two completeness measures use very different data and calculations. The probability of genus preservation depends almost entirely on the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic records, whereas the proportion of living families with a fossil record is influenced largely by Cenozoic data. These measurements are nonetheless highly correlated, with outliers quite explicable, and we find that completeness is rather high for many animal groups.

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Exobiology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11536900     DOI: 10.1038/18872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  23 in total

1.  Anatomical and ecological constraints on Phanerozoic animal diversity in the marine realm.

Authors:  Richard K Bambach; Andrew H Knoll; J John Sepkoski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Taxonomy and fossils: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Peter L Forey; Richard A Fortey; Paul Kenrick; Andrew B Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Graptoloid diversity and disparity became decoupled during the Ordovician mass extinction.

Authors:  David W Bapst; Peter C Bullock; Michael J Melchin; H David Sheets; Charles E Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multiple Miocene Melastomataceae dispersal between Madagascar, Africa and India.

Authors:  Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Phanerozoic marine biodiversity dynamics in light of the incompleteness of the fossil record.

Authors:  Peter J Lu; Motohiro Yogo; Charles R Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Scale-dependence of Cope's rule in body size evolution of Paleozoic brachiopods.

Authors:  Philip M Novack-Gottshall; Michael A Lanier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The 'Goldilocks' effect: preservation bias in vertebrate track assemblages.

Authors:  P L Falkingham; K T Bates; L Margetts; P L Manning
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Extinction intensity, selectivity and their combined macroevolutionary influence in the fossil record.

Authors:  Jonathan L Payne; Andrew M Bush; Ellen T Chang; Noel A Heim; Matthew L Knope; Sara B Pruss
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Ancestor-descendant relationships in evolution: origin of the extant pygmy right whale, Caperea marginata.

Authors:  Cheng-Hsiu Tsai; R Ewan Fordyce
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Estimating the diversity of dinosaurs.

Authors:  Steve C Wang; Peter Dodson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.