Literature DB >> 11536596

34S/32S fractionation in sulfur cycles catalyzed by anaerobic bacteria.

B Fry1, H Gest, J M Hayes.   

Abstract

Stable isotopic distributions in the sulfur cycle were studied with pure and mixed cultures of the anaerobic bacteria, Chlorobium vibrioforme and Desulfovibrio vulgaris. D. vulgaris and C. vibrioforme can catalyze three reactions constituting a complete anaerobic sulfur cycle: reduction of sulfate to sulfide (D. vulgaris), oxidation of sulfide to elemental sulfur (C. vibrioforme), and oxidation of sulfur to sulfate (C. vibrioforme). In all experiments, the first and last reactions favored concentration of the light 32S isotope in products (isotopic fractionation factor epsilon = -7.2 and -1.7%, respectively), whereas oxidation of sulfide favored concentration of the heavy 34S isotope in products (epsilon = +1.7%). Experimental results and model calculations suggest that elemental sulfur enriched in 34S versus sulfide may be a biogeochemical marker for the presence of sulfide-oxidizing bacteria in modern and ancient environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Exobiology; NASA Discipline Number 52-30; NASA Program Exobiology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 11536596      PMCID: PMC202429          DOI: 10.1128/aem.54.1.250-256.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  4 in total

1.  Sources of carbon and sulfur nutrition for consumers in three meromictic lakes of New York State.

Authors:  B Fry
Journal:  Limnol Oceanogr       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.745

2.  Sulfur isotope effects associated with protonation of HS- and volatilization of H2S.

Authors:  B Fry; H Gest; J M Hayes
Journal:  Isot Geosci       Date:  1986

3.  Discrimination between 34S and 32S during bacterial metabolism of inorganic sulfur compounds.

Authors:  B Fry; J Cox; H Gest; J M Hayes
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria with sulfur as electron acceptor.

Authors:  H Biebl
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1977-02-04       Impact factor: 2.552

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Diversity of sulfur isotope fractionations by sulfate-reducing prokaryotes.

Authors:  J Detmers; V Brüchert; K S Habicht; J Kuever
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Kinetic enrichment of 34S during proteobacterial thiosulfate oxidation and the conserved role of SoxB in S-S bond breaking.

Authors:  Masrure Alam; Prosenjit Pyne; Aninda Mazumdar; Aditya Peketi; Wriddhiman Ghosh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bacterial diversity and sulfur cycling in a mesophilic sulfide-rich spring.

Authors:  Mostafa S Elshahed; John M Senko; Fares Z Najar; Stephen M Kenton; Bruce A Roe; Thomas A Dewers; John R Spear; Lee R Krumholz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Sulfur isotope analysis for representative regional background atmospheric aerosols collected at Mt. Lulin, Taiwan.

Authors:  Chuan-Hsiung Chung; Chen-Feng You; Shih-Chieh Hsu; Mao-Chang Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Isotopic Fractionation of Sulfur in Carbonyl Sulfide by Carbonyl Sulfide Hydrolase of Thiobacillus thioparus THI115.

Authors:  Takahiro Ogawa; Shohei Hattori; Kazuki Kamezaki; Hiromi Kato; Naohiro Yoshida; Yoko Katayama
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Constraining the rise of oxygen with oxygen isotopes.

Authors:  B A Killingsworth; P Sansjofre; P Philippot; P Cartigny; C Thomazo; S V Lalonde
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.