Literature DB >> 11535676

Noise priming and the effects of different cochlear centrifugal pathways on loud-sound-induced hearing loss.

R Rajan1.   

Abstract

Priming/conditioning the cochlea with moderately loud sound can reduce damage caused by subsequent loud sound. This study examined immediate effects of short-term priming with monaural broadband noise on temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) in hearing caused by a subsequent loud high-frequency tone and the role of centrifugal olivocochlear pathways. Priming caused delay-dependent changes in tone-induced TTSs, particularly or only at frequencies higher than the peak tone-affected frequency, through two general effects: a short-lasting increase in cochlear susceptibility to loud sound and longer-lasting complex end effects of centrifugal pathways. The results indicated the following points. Priming noise had "pure" cochlear effects, outlasting its presentation and declining with delay, that exacerbated tone-induced TTSs at frequencies higher than the peak tone-affected frequency. The centrifugal uncrossed medial olivocochlear system (UMOCS) could prevent this noise exacerbation and as this noise effect declined, could even reduce tone-induced TTSs below those to the unprimed tone. For longer delays, when priming noise no longer had any exacerbative "pure" cochlear effects on TTSs, UMOCS exacerbated TTSs above those to the unprimed tone. The crossed medial olivocochlear system (CMOCS) appeared to show a gradual "build-up" of effects postpriming. A parallel study showed it exercised no end effect on TTSs when noise and tone were concurrent. With priming, CMOCS effects were observed. For the shortest priming delay, the CMOCS blocked a UMOCS effect preventing noise exacerbation of tone-induced TTSs. For longer delays, CMOCS end effects, when present, reduced tone-induced TTSs below those to the unprimed tone. The CMOCS may oscillate between producing these effects and exerting no end-effect. With increasing delay CMOCS protection occurred in a greater proportion of animals. Finally, with a delay of 600 s between primer and loud tone, all these systems appeared to have reset to normal so that TTSs were similar to those in the unprimed condition. Thus the effects of short-term priming are not simple and do not suggest that centrifugal pathways act automatically as a protective system during such priming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11535676     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  4 in total

Review 1.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

2.  Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?

Authors:  Erik Larsen; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Efferent Inhibition of the Cochlea.

Authors:  Paul Albert Fuchs; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 4.  The olivocochlear system and protection from acoustic trauma: a mini literature review.

Authors:  Adrian Fuente
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.