Literature DB >> 11535572

Different patterns of interatrial conduction in clockwise and counterclockwise atrial flutter.

J E Marine1, V J Korley, O Obioha-Ngwu, J Chen, P Zimetbaum, P Papageorgiou, P Milliez, M E Josephson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The terms counterclockwise (CC) and clockwise (C) atrial flutter (Afl) are used to describe right atrial activation around the tricuspid valve in the left anterior oblique view. The manner in which the left atrium is activated, as reflected by coronary sinus (CS) recordings, has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Nine patients with both CC and C Afl underwent electrophysiological study with CS recordings during both rhythms with the use of a decapolar catheter with the tip placed in the distal CS. Patterns of CS activation during each type of Afl as well as during during sinus rhythm were categorized into 1 of 3 patterns: sequential proximal-to-distal, sequential distal-to-proximal, and fused, indicating activation from different directions. In 7 of 9 patients, the pattern of CS activation in CC Afl and C Afl differed, with a proximal-to-distal pattern in CC Afl and a fused pattern in C Afl. In 2 patients, pacing the high right atrial septum near the presumed site of Bachmann's bundle in sinus rhythm showed a similar fused pattern of CS activation.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate different patterns of CS activation in CC Afl and C Afl in the majority of patients and are consistent with a model in which the left atrium is activated predominantly over Bachmann's bundle during C Afl and over the CS os in CC Afl. These findings may have implications for maintenance of Afl, interpretation of flutter wave morphology on surface ECG, and left atrial mechanical function in Afl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11535572     DOI: 10.1161/hc3501.095478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

1.  Why a sawtooth? Inferences on the generation of the flutter wave during typical atrial flutter drawn from radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Neil E Bernstein; David A Sandler; Mark Goh; David Y Feigenblum; Douglas S Holmes; Larry A Chinitz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Mechanisms of atypical flutter wave morphology in patients with isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.

Authors:  Su-Hua Yan; Wen-Juan Cheng; Le-Xin Wang; Ming-You Chen; He-Sheng Hu; Mei Xue
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Accurate ECG diagnosis of atrial tachyarrhythmias using quantitative analysis: a prospective diagnostic and cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  David E Krummen; Mitul Patel; Hong Nguyen; Gordon Ho; Dhruv S Kazi; Paul Clopton; Marian C Holland; Scott L Greenberg; Gregory K Feld; Mitchell N Faddis; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11

4.  Focal atrial tachycardia arising from the cavotricuspid isthmus with saw-tooth morphology on the surface ECG: electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics.

Authors:  Hirokazu Sato; Tetsuo Yagi; Akio Namekawa; Akihiko Ishida; Yoshihiro Yamashina; Takashi Nakagawa; Manjirou Sakuramoto; Eiji Sato; Tomoyuki Yambe
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Predictability in complex atrial arrhythmias: The N/N-1 algorithm to guide ablation of atrial tachycardias.

Authors:  Daniel W Kaiser; Albert J Rogers; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.779

6.  Detection of sequential activation of left atrium and coronary sinus musculature in the general population.

Authors:  Masaki Ota; Yoshiaki Kaneko; Tadashi Nakajima; Tadanobu Irie; Takafumi Iijima; Akihiro Saito; Masahiko Kurabayashi
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-06-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.