Literature DB >> 11534807

Validation of three-dimensional surface characterising methods: scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy.

B Al-Nawas1, K A Grotz, H Götz, G Heinrich, T G Rippin, T E Stender, H Duschner, W Wagner.   

Abstract

Surface characteristics of enosseous titanium implants have been known to influence the quality of osseointegration. Parameters recommended for metrical analysis should be supplemented by a topographical description. In this study, Ra values obtained by established tactile and optical profilometric methods are correlated with those obtained by stereo scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). As test specimens, standardised CVD diamond-coated titanium alloys with different microwave coating power ranging from 2,000 to 3,000 W were used. A non-CVD-coated corund grit-blasted specimen (NC) was used as reference. After coating with a CVD, power of 2,000 W Ra ranges from 4.33 to 5.69 microm depending on the method used. With increasing power of the coating process, the amplitude of the surface roughness is significantly increased to 4.53 to 6.89 microm. Ra values of the same sample obtained by different methods are also significantly different (p = 0.001). Compared with the established methods of tactile and optical profilometry, SEM and CLSM offer valid data on the surface roughness accompanied by a topographical imaging. In future studies, the underlying method should be specified to interpret roughness values correctly, as not every method is suitable for each specimen and values obtained by different methods vary extremely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11534807     DOI: 10.1002/sca.4950230401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scanning        ISSN: 0161-0457            Impact factor:   1.932


  4 in total

1.  Regenerating titanium ventricular assist device surfaces after gold/palladium coating for scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  Hardean E Achneck; Michael J Serpe; Ryan M Jamiolkowski; Leslie M Eibest; Stephen L Craig; Jeffrey H Lawson
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  The effect of different surface treatment techniques on the surface roughness of feldspathic porcelain.

Authors:  Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu; Ergul Erturk
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  Effect of surface treatment on enamel surface roughness.

Authors:  Seyda Ersahan; Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2016-01-12

4.  AFM-Based Method for Measurement of Normal and Osteoarthritic Human Articular Cartilage Surface Roughness.

Authors:  Mikhail Ihnatouski; Jolanta Pauk; Dmitrij Karev; Boris Karev
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.