Literature DB >> 11534562

Acute effects of ventilator settings on respiratory motor output in patients with acute lung injury.

E Kondili1, G Prinianakis, M Anastasaki, D Georgopoulos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: During assisted mechanical ventilation, changes in ventilator settings may acutely affect the respiratory motor output via the mechanoreceptor reflex feedback system, thus interfering with patient management. This feedback system in mechanically ventilated patients with parenchymal lung injury remains largely unexplored. To investigate this, the early response of respiratory motor output to varying ventilator settings was determined in 13 sedated patients with acute lung injury.
DESIGN: During assist/control and pressure support (PS) ventilation changes in (1) tidal volume (V(T)) at fixed inspiratory flow (V'(I)), (2) V'(I) at fixed V(T) and (3) PS level were employed and the response of respiratory motor output was followed for two breaths after the change. Respiratory motor output was assessed by total pressure generated by the respiratory muscles (Pmus), computed from esophageal pressure (Pes).
RESULTS: Neural expiratory time increased with increasing V(T) and PS, while it remained constant with V'I changes. Neural inspiratory time (T(I)n) increased with decreasing V'(I) and PS, but was not affected by V(T) changes. None of the changes in ventilator settings influenced significantly the rate of rise of Pmus, used as an index of respiratory drive. The changes in respiratory timing resulted in significant changes in breathing frequency, which increased with decreasing V(T) and PS and increasing V'(I). The time integral of Pmus, an index of respiratory effort, increased with increasing T(I)n. These acute responses were not related to the severity of deterioration of respiratory system mechanics.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that alterations in commonly used ventilator settings induce acute changes in respiratory timing, without affecting the respiratory drive. These changes, probably mediated via mechanoreceptor reflex feedback, are dependent on the type of the alteration in the ventilator settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11534562     DOI: 10.1007/s001340101000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  6 in total

1.  Effects of the flow waveform method of triggering and cycling on patient-ventilator interaction during pressure support.

Authors:  George Prinianakis; Eumorfia Kondili; Dimitris Georgopoulos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Respiratory system as the main determinant of dyspnea in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Ioanna Mitrouska; Maria Bolaki; Katerina Vaporidi; Dimitris Georgopoulos
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.886

3.  Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and pressure support ventilation in small species and the impact of instrumental dead space.

Authors:  Francesca Campoccia Jalde; Abdul Raoof Almadhoob; Jennifer Beck; Arthur S Slutsky; Michael S Dunn; Christer Sinderby
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Physiologic response to varying levels of pressure support and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Davide Colombo; Gianmaria Cammarota; Valentina Bergamaschi; Marta De Lucia; Francesco Della Corte; Paolo Navalesi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in rabbits with acute lung injury.

Authors:  Jennifer Beck; Lukas Brander; Arthur S Slutsky; Maureen C Reilly; Michael S Dunn; Christer Sinderby
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Patient-ventilator interaction during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Jennifer Beck; Maureen Reilly; Giacomo Grasselli; Lucia Mirabella; Arthur S Slutsky; Michael S Dunn; Christer Sinderby
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.756

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.