Literature DB >> 11534056

Effect of physical activity on bone mineral density assessed by limb dominance across the lifespan.

Philip D. Chilibeck1, K. Shawn Davison, Digby G. Sale, Colin E. Webber, Robert A. Faulkner.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density is higher in dominant vs. nondominant limbs, implying that the greater use of dominant limbs in everyday activities results in the deposition of more bone or that the dominant limb is genetically larger. The objective of the present study was to determine whether bone mineral density differences between dominant and nondominant arms were greater in older vs. younger women. To determine whether this was due to a greater lifetime of preferential loading of the dominant arm, differences between dominant and nondominant arms were compared to accumulated amounts of physical activities which emphasized use of the dominant arm. Bone mineral density of dominant and nondominant arms was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in groups of younger (n = 35; age = 20.9) and older (n = 53; age = 57.4) women. The difference between arms was greater in the older vs. the younger group (5.2% vs. 1.9%, respectively, P < 0.01). Within the older group, total lifetime energy expenditure during activities emphasizing loading of the dominant arm correlated with the bone mineral difference between dominant and nondominant arms (r = 0.47, P < 0.01). This implies that a greater lifetime of preferential loading of the dominant arm in the older group resulted in a greater difference between arms. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 12:633-637, 2000. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11534056     DOI: 10.1002/1520-6300(200009/10)12:5<633::AID-AJHB8>3.0.CO;2-W

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  2 in total

1.  The development of bone mineral lateralization in the arms.

Authors:  K Siminoski; K-C Lee; S Abish; N Alos; L Bell; T Blydt-Hansen; R Couch; E A Cummings; J Ellsworth; J Feber; C V Fernandez; J Halton; A M Huber; S Israels; R Jurencak; B Lang; C Laverdière; C LeBlanc; V Lewis; J Midgley; P M Miettunen; K Oen; V Phan; M Pinsk; F Rauch; C Rodd; J Roth; C Saint-Cyr; R Scuccimarri; D Stephure; S Taback; B Wilson; L M Ward
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Dominant vs. non-dominant hip comparison in bone mineral density in young sporting athletes.

Authors:  James A van Santen; Claudio Pereira; Maria T Sanchez-Santos; Cyrus Cooper; Nigel K Arden
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 2.617

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.