K E Porter1, T Dickinson, N J London. 1. Department of Surgery, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester University, Leicester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been implicated in a variety of vascular pathologic conditions, although there is considerable controversy as to whether such effects are mediated by the ET-(A) or ET-(B) receptor. This study investigated whether inhibition of big ET-1 processing by inhibition of endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE) could, therefore, offer an alternative therapeutic strategy in the prevention of vein graft intimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Human saphenous vein (3 equal segments from 10 patients) were maintained in organ culture for 14 days with either 50 micromol/L CGS 26303 (a dual ECE/neutral endopeptidase [NEP] inhibitor), 50 micromol/L CGS 24592 (a selective NEP inhibitor), or vehicle (control). They were then processed for immunostaining and neointimal thickness measurements, and conditioned media was collected for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis. RESULTS: Neointimal thickness in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins did not differ significantly from that of control segments. However, there was a highly significant augmentation in the NEP-inhibited segments, consistent with an inhibition of ET-1 degradation (median difference, 16.8; 95% CI, -23.5, -10.4; P =.002, Wilcoxon). ECE immunostaining was reduced in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins, although ET-1 staining was also present. ET-1 expression was intense in the thickened neointimas of NEP-inhibited veins, which also showed significant ECE staining. Elevated levels of big ET-1 were measured in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins, consistent with reduced ECE activity. However, mature ET-1 was still detectable in these segments. CONCLUSION: There is a requirement for potent and selective inhibitors of ECE to evaluate fully the potential therapeutic benefits of blocking ET-1 biosynthesis. The use of dual inhibitors complicates the interpretation of results, because the observed response is likely to be a combination of both ECE and NEP inhibition.
PURPOSE:Endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been implicated in a variety of vascular pathologic conditions, although there is considerable controversy as to whether such effects are mediated by the ET-(A) or ET-(B) receptor. This study investigated whether inhibition of big ET-1 processing by inhibition of endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE) could, therefore, offer an alternative therapeutic strategy in the prevention of vein graft intimal hyperplasia. METHODS:Human saphenous vein (3 equal segments from 10 patients) were maintained in organ culture for 14 days with either 50 micromol/L CGS 26303 (a dual ECE/neutral endopeptidase [NEP] inhibitor), 50 micromol/L CGS 24592 (a selective NEP inhibitor), or vehicle (control). They were then processed for immunostaining and neointimal thickness measurements, and conditioned media was collected for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis. RESULTS: Neointimal thickness in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins did not differ significantly from that of control segments. However, there was a highly significant augmentation in the NEP-inhibited segments, consistent with an inhibition of ET-1 degradation (median difference, 16.8; 95% CI, -23.5, -10.4; P =.002, Wilcoxon). ECE immunostaining was reduced in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins, although ET-1 staining was also present. ET-1 expression was intense in the thickened neointimas of NEP-inhibited veins, which also showed significant ECE staining. Elevated levels of big ET-1 were measured in the ECE/NEP-inhibited veins, consistent with reduced ECE activity. However, mature ET-1 was still detectable in these segments. CONCLUSION: There is a requirement for potent and selective inhibitors of ECE to evaluate fully the potential therapeutic benefits of blocking ET-1 biosynthesis. The use of dual inhibitors complicates the interpretation of results, because the observed response is likely to be a combination of both ECE and NEP inhibition.
Authors: Luciana B Lopes; Colleen M Brophy; Charles R Flynn; Zhengping Yi; Benjamin P Bowen; Christopher Smoke; Brandon Seal; Alyssa Panitch; Padmini Komalavilas Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Lynn McKeown; Nicholas K Moss; Paul Turner; Jing Li; Nikki Heath; Dermot Burke; David O'Regan; Mark S Gilthorpe; Karen E Porter; David J Beech Journal: Circ Res Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Binata Joddar; Michael S Firstenberg; Rashmeet K Reen; Saradhadevi Varadharaj; Mahmood Khan; Rachel C Childers; Jay L Zweier; Keith J Gooch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240