W C Bordley1, P A Margolis, J Stuart, C Lannon, L Keyes. 1. Children's Primary Care Research Group, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7225, USA. cbordley@med.unc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Rates of childhood immunizations and other preventive services are lower in many practices than national goals and providers' own estimates. Office systems have been used in adult settings to improve the delivery of preventive care, but their effectiveness in pediatric practices is unknown. This study was designed to determine whether a group of primary care practices in 1 community could implement office-based quality improvement systems that would significantly improve their delivery of childhood preventive services. The study was part of a larger community-wide intervention study reported in a preceding study. METHODS: All the major providers of primary care to children in 1 community were recruited and agreed to participate (N = 8 practices). Project staff worked on-site with improvement teams in each practice to develop tailored systems to assess and improve the delivery of immunizations and screening for anemia, tuberculosis, and lead exposure. Office-based quality improvement systems typically involved some combination of chart prescreening, risk assessment forms, Post-it prompts, flow-sheets, reminder/recall systems, and patient education materials. Office systems also often involved redistributing responsibilities among office staff. RESULTS: All 8 participating practices created improvement teams. Project staff met with the practices 10 to 15 times over 12 months. After the period of office assistance, the overall rates for all preventive services except tuberculosis screening increased by amounts that were both clinically and statistically significant. Absolute percent improvements included: complete immunizations at 12 months, 7%; complete immunizations at 24 months, 12%; anemia screening, 30%; lead screening, 36%. The amount of improvement achieved varied considerably between practices. CONCLUSIONS: Office systems and the principles of quality improvement that underlie them seem to be effective in improving the delivery of childhood preventive services. Important predisposing factors may exist within practices that affect the likelihood that an individual practice will make significant improvements. prevention, immunizations, improvement, office systems, primary care.
OBJECTIVE: Rates of childhood immunizations and other preventive services are lower in many practices than national goals and providers' own estimates. Office systems have been used in adult settings to improve the delivery of preventive care, but their effectiveness in pediatric practices is unknown. This study was designed to determine whether a group of primary care practices in 1 community could implement office-based quality improvement systems that would significantly improve their delivery of childhood preventive services. The study was part of a larger community-wide intervention study reported in a preceding study. METHODS: All the major providers of primary care to children in 1 community were recruited and agreed to participate (N = 8 practices). Project staff worked on-site with improvement teams in each practice to develop tailored systems to assess and improve the delivery of immunizations and screening for anemia, tuberculosis, and lead exposure. Office-based quality improvement systems typically involved some combination of chart prescreening, risk assessment forms, Post-it prompts, flow-sheets, reminder/recall systems, and patient education materials. Office systems also often involved redistributing responsibilities among office staff. RESULTS: All 8 participating practices created improvement teams. Project staff met with the practices 10 to 15 times over 12 months. After the period of office assistance, the overall rates for all preventive services except tuberculosis screening increased by amounts that were both clinically and statistically significant. Absolute percent improvements included: complete immunizations at 12 months, 7%; complete immunizations at 24 months, 12%; anemia screening, 30%; lead screening, 36%. The amount of improvement achieved varied considerably between practices. CONCLUSIONS: Office systems and the principles of quality improvement that underlie them seem to be effective in improving the delivery of childhood preventive services. Important predisposing factors may exist within practices that affect the likelihood that an individual practice will make significant improvements. prevention, immunizations, improvement, office systems, primary care.
Authors: Allen J Dietrich; Thomas E Oxman; John W Williams; Kurt Kroenke; H Charles Schulberg; Martha Bruce; Sheila L Barry Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Kathleen M Mazor; Aruna Priya; Michael Moran; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2019-05-20
Authors: Julie A Gorzkowski; Jonathan D Klein; Donna L Harris; Kristen R Kaseeska; Regina M Whitmore Shaefer; Alison B Bocian; James B Davis; Edward M Gotlieb; Richard C Wasserman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sharon B Meropol; Nicholas K Schiltz; Abdus Sattar; Kurt C Stange; Ann H Nevar; Christina Davey; Gerald A Ferretti; Diana E Howell; Robyn Strosaker; Pamela Vavrek; Samantha Bader; Mary C Ruhe; Leona Cuttler Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Karen L Margolis; Leif I Solberg; A Lauren Crain; Robin R Whitebird; Kristin A Ohnsorg; Nancy Jaeckels; Gary Oftedahl; Russell E Glasgow Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 5.128