Literature DB >> 11533277

Selenium from selenium-rich Spirulina is less bioavailable than selenium from sodium selenite and selenomethionine in selenium-deficient rats.

J Cases1, V Vacchina, A Napolitano, B Caporiccio, P Besançon, R Lobinski, J M Rouanet.   

Abstract

The bioavailabilty of selenium (Se) from selenium-rich Spirulina (SeSp) was assessed in Se-deficient rats by measuring tissue Se accumulation and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity. For 42 d, rats were subjected to dietary Se depletion by consumption of a Torula yeast (TY)-based diet with no Se; controls were fed the same diet supplemented with 75 microg Se/kg diet as sodium selenite. Se-deficient rats were then repleted with Se (75 microg/kg) by the addition of sodium selenite, selenomethionine (SeMet) or SeSp to the TY basal diet. Selenium speciation in SeSp emphasized the quasi-absence of selenite (2% of total Se); organic Se comprised SeMet (approximately 18%), with the majority present in the form of two selenoproteins (20-30 kDa and 80 kDa). Gross absorption of Se from SeSp was significantly lower than from free SeMet and sodium selenite. SeMet was less effective than sodium selenite in restoring Se concentration in the liver but not in kidney. SeSp was always much less effective. Similarly, Se from SeSp was less effective than the other forms of Se in restoring GSH-Px activity, except in plasma and red blood cells where no differences were noted among the three sources. This was confirmed by measuring the bioavailability of Se by slope-ratio analysis using selenite as the reference form of Se. Although Se from SeSp did not replenish Se concentration and GSH-Px activity in most tissues to the same degree as the other forms of Se, we conclude that it is biologically useful and differently metabolized due to its chemical form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11533277     DOI: 10.1093/jn/131.9.2343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of proline reduction in the nosocomial pathogen Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Sarah Jackson; Mary Calos; Andrew Myers; William T Self
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Influence of domestic processing on the bioaccessibility of selenium from selected food grains and composite meals.

Authors:  Anjum Khanam; Kalpana Platel
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Synergic activity of selenium and probiotic bacterium Enterococcus faecium M-74 against selected mutagens in Salmonella assay.

Authors:  A Belicová; L Krizková; J Dobias; J Krajcovic; L Ebringer
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Selenium-enriched foods are more effective at increasing glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity compared with selenomethionine: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma N Bermingham; John E Hesketh; Bruce R Sinclair; John P Koolaard; Nicole C Roy
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 5.  Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: revisiting our understanding.

Authors:  Mark L Wells; Philippe Potin; James S Craigie; John A Raven; Sabeeha S Merchant; Katherine E Helliwell; Alison G Smith; Mary Ellen Camire; Susan H Brawley
Journal:  J Appl Phycol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Can selenium-enriched spirulina supplementation ameliorate sepsis outcomes in selenium-deficient animals?

Authors:  Thomas Castel; Michaël Theron; Karine Pichavant-Rafini; Anthony Guernec; Aurélie Joublin-Delavat; Bleuenn Gueguen; Karelle Leon
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-07

7.  Nutritional Quality and Safety of the Spirulina Dietary Supplements Sold on the Slovenian Market.

Authors:  Jasmina Masten Rutar; Marta Jagodic Hudobivnik; Marijan Nečemer; Katarina Vogel Mikuš; Iztok Arčon; Nives Ogrinc
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.