Literature DB >> 11532853

Outcome in prostate cancer associations with skin type and polymorphism in pigmentation-related genes.

C J Luscombe1, M E French, S Liu, M F Saxby, P W Jones, A A Fryer, R C Strange.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have suggested that UV exerts a protective effect on prostate cancer. Accordingly, we determined, in 210 prostate cancer cases, whether parameters of exposure, skin type and polymorphism in MC1R, VDR and TYR were associated with the outcome parameters, histological grade, clinical stage and presence of bone metastases. We used logistic regression analysis, with correction for age and metastases, stage and grade in the models, to determine if the frequencies of individual factors were different in the patient groups. The development of metastases was not associated with UV exposure parameters. Paradoxically, patients with skin type 1 were at significantly reduced risk [P = 0.027, odds ratio (OR) 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.82] of developing metastases compared with cases with skin type 4. MC1R Val92/Val92 and VDR ff were associated with increased risk of metastases (ORs 4.30 and 4.98, respectively). Further, cumulative exposure (P = 0.005, OR 0.85/year) and increasing proportion of outdoor occupation (P = 0.001, OR 0.84/unit) were associated with reduced risk of advanced stage tumours. Skin types, MC1R or VDR genotypes were not significantly associated with advanced stage. None of the exposure parameters, skin types or genotypes were associated with tumour grade. While MC1R Val92/Val92 and VDR ff were only associated with bone metastases, TYR genotypes were associated with each of the outcome parameters. Thus, in logistic regression models that included age, but not advanced stage and high grade histology, TYR A1A2 was significantly associated with reduced risk of metastases (P = 0.033, OR 0.41). Similarly, in models that included age but not the other outcome parameters, associations between TYR A2A2 and high-grade and advanced stage were significant (P = 0.040, OR 0.41) or approached significance (P = 0.052, OR 0.44), respectively. These data indicate for the first time that pigmentation response to UV is associated with outcome in prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11532853     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/22.9.1343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  9 in total

1.  Life course sun exposure and risk of prostate cancer: population-based nested case-control study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Gilbert; Chris Metcalfe; Steven E Oliver; David C Whiteman; Chris Bain; Andy Ness; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Vitamin D pathway gene variants and prostate cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Sarah K Holt; Erika M Kwon; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Daniel W Lin; Ziding Feng; Elaine A Ostrander; Ulrike Peters; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 3.  The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention.

Authors:  Cedric F Garland; Frank C Garland; Edward D Gorham; Martin Lipkin; Harold Newmark; Sharif B Mohr; Michael F Holick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Vitamin D Receptor Genetic Polymorphisms and Prostate Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis of 36 Published Studies.

Authors:  Ming Yin; Sheng Wei; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-06-15

5.  Vitamin d, sunlight and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Krishna Vanaja Donkena; Charles Y F Young
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2011-06-08

6.  A prospective study of plasma vitamin D metabolites, vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Haojie Li; Meir J Stampfer; J Bruce W Hollis; Lorelei A Mucci; J Michael Gaziano; David Hunter; Edward L Giovannucci; Jing Ma
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Vitamin D receptor Taq I polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaosan Kang; Yansheng Zhao; Lei Wang; Jian Liu; Xi Chen; Xiaofeng Liu; Zhijie Shi; Weixing Gao; Fenghong Cao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-22

8.  Using genetic proxies for lifecourse sun exposure to assess the causal relationship of sun exposure with circulating vitamin d and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Carolina Bonilla; Rebecca Gilbert; John P Kemp; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Jenny L Donovan; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; William D Fraser; Smith George Davey; Sarah J Lewis; Mark Lathrop; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  A novel polymorphism in the 1A promoter region of the vitamin D receptor is associated with altered susceptibilty and prognosis in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  J A Halsall; J E Osborne; L Potter; J H Pringle; P E Hutchinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.