Literature DB >> 11531751

Computed tomography versus intravenous urography in diagnosis of acute flank pain from urolithiasis: a randomized study comparing imaging costs and radiation dose.

J M Thomson1, J Glocer, C Abbott, T M Maling, S Mark.   

Abstract

The equivalent sensitivity of non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and intravenous urography (IVU) in the diagnosis of suspected ureteric colic has been established. Approximately 50% of patients with suspected ureteric colic do not have a nephro-urological cause for pain. Because many such patients require further imaging studies, NCCT may obviate the need for these studies and, in so doing, be more cost effective and involve less overall radiation exposure. The present study compares the total imaging cost and radiation dose of NCCT versus IVU in the diagnosis of acute flank pain. Two hundred and twenty-four patients (157 men; mean age 45 years; age range 19-79 years) with suspected renal colic were randomized either to NCCT or IVU. The number of additional diagnostic imaging studies, cost (IVU A$136; CTU A$173), radiation exposure and imaging times were compared. Of 119 (53%) patients with renal obstruction, 105 had no nephro-urological causes of pain. For 21 (20%) of these patients an alternative diagnosis was made at the initial imaging, 10 of which were significant. Of 118 IVU patients, 28 (24%) required 32 additional imaging tests to reach a diagnosis, whereas seven of 106 (6%) NCCT patients required seven additional imaging studies. The average total diagnostic imaging cost for the NCCT group was A$181.94 and A$175.46 for the IVU group (P < 0.43). Mean radiation dose to diagnosis was 5.00 mSv (NCCT) versus 3.50 mSv (IVU) (P < 0.001). Mean imaging time was 30 min (NCCT) versus 75 min (IVU) (P < 0.001). Diagnostic imaging costs were remarkably similar. Although NCCT involves a higher radiation dose than IVU, its advantages of faster diagnosis, the avoidance of additional diagnostic imaging tests and its ability to diagnose other causes makes it the study of choice for acute flank pain at Christchurch Hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11531751     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00923.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  14 in total

1.  [Infectious diseases and injuries of bladder and urinary tract].

Authors:  J Budjan; P Riffel; M M Ong; C Bolenz; S O Schönberg; S Haneder
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Evaluation of low-dose dual energy computed tomography for in vivo assessment of renal/ureteric calculus composition.

Authors:  Harshavardhan Mahalingam; Anupam Lal; Arup K Mandal; Shrawan Kumar Singh; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-08-10

Review 3.  [Imaging techniques and their impact in treatment management of patients with acute flank pain].

Authors:  A Grosse; C A Grosse; J Mauermann; G Heinz-Peer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  [Diagnostic imaging--the end of intravenous urography?].

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; R Bartunek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  [Management of ureteral stones].

Authors:  M Straub; M Bader; F Strittmatter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Patient radiation exposure during ureteroscopic stone extraction].

Authors:  G Zöller; P Virsik-Köpp; C Vowinkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Intra-patient comparison of reduced-dose model-based iterative reconstruction with standard-dose adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in the CT diagnosis and follow-up of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Sean Tenant; Chun Lap Pang; Prageeth Dissanayake; Varut Vardhanabhuti; Colin Stuckey; Catherine Gutteridge; Christopher Hyde; Carl Roobottom
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques.

Authors:  Wayne Brisbane; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Low-dose unenhanced CT protocols according to individual body size for evaluating suspected renal colic: cumulative radiation exposures.

Authors:  S Tartari; R Rizzati; R Righi; A Deledda; S Terrani; G Benea
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 10.  Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  S A Pfister; A Deckart; S Laschke; S Dellas; U Otto; C Buitrago; J Roth; W Wiesner; G Bongartz; T C Gasser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.