Literature DB >> 11531627

Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia.

T J Clark1, C H Mann, N Shah, K S Khan, F Song, J K Gupta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia in women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
DESIGN: Systematic quantitative review of published medical literature. DATA SOURCES: Relevant papers were identified through electronic scanning of MEDLINE (1980-1999) and EMBASE (1980-1999), manual searching of bibliography of known primary and review articles and contact with manufacturers. REVIEW
METHODS: Studies were selected if accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy, in women with abnormal pre or postmenopausal uterine bleeding, was estimated compared to a reference standard, which was endometrial histology obtained by tissue sampling under anesthesia. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by pooled likelihood ratios (LR) for positive and negative test results for endometrial hyperplasia.
RESULTS: There were 881 subjects in 8 diagnostic evaluations reported in 6 primary studies. Postmenopausal women represented 25% of the participants studied. There were 43 patients in whom outpatient sampling was inadequate. A positive test result on outpatient biopsy diagnosed endometrial hyperplasia with a pooled LR of 12.0 (95% CI 7.8-18.6) while a negative test result had a pooled LR of 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.3). With a positive test result, the posttest probability of endometrial hyperplasia was 57.7% (95% CI 41.1%-72.7%) while it was 2.2% (95% CI 0.9%-4.1%) with a negative test.
CONCLUSION: Outpatient endometrial biopsy has modest accuracy in diagnosing endometrial hyperplasia. Therefore, additional endometrial assessment should be undertaken, especially if symptoms persist or intrauterine structural abnormalities are suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11531627     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080009784.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  11 in total

1.  Results of a questionnaire regarding criteria for adequacy of endometrial biopsies.

Authors:  V Phillips; W G McCluggage
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Ibrahim Anwar Abdelazim; Amro Aboelezz; Amr Fathy Abdulkareem
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2013-03-01

3.  Project for the National Program of Early Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer Part I.

Authors:  R E Bohîlțea; V Ancăr; M M Cirstoiu; V Rădoi; L C Bohîlțea; F Furtunescu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

4.  Endometrial sampling in low-risk patients with abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Brenda F Narice; Brigitte Delaney; Jon M Dickson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Diagnostic Value of Cytology in Detecting Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy or Salpingo-Oophorectomy.

Authors:  Tajossadat Allameh; Shiva Danesh-Pour; Nooshin Afshar Moghadam; Shima Danesh-Pour
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2019-03-20

6.  Diagnostic Values of Pipelle and Standard Curettage Compared to Hysterectomy Pathology in Postmenopausal Bleeding: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Fariba Behnamfar; Elham Arshad
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2020-10-30

Review 7.  Bias associated with delayed verification in test accuracy studies: accuracy of tests for endometrial hyperplasia may be much higher than we think!

Authors:  T Justin Clark; Gerben ter Riet; Aravinthan Coomarasamy; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between endometrial curettage and aspiration biopsy in patients treated with progestin for endometrial hyperplasia: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Mi Kyoung Kim; Seok Ju Seong; Dong Choon Park; Jin Hwa Hong; Ju Won Roh; Soon Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Response to comment on: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between endometrial curettage and aspiration biopsy in patients treated with progestin for endometrial hyperplasia: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Mi Kyoung Kim; Seok Ju Seong
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Validity of pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Shazia Fakhar; Gulshan Saeed; Amir Hussain Khan; Ali Yawar Alam
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.