Literature DB >> 11531234

Developing a spatial framework of common ecological regions for the conterminous United States.

G McMahon1, S M Gregonis, S W Waltman, J M Omernik, T D Thorson, J A Freeouf, A H Rorick, J E Keys.   

Abstract

In 1996, nine federal agencies with mandates to inventory and manage the nation's land, water, and biological resources signed a memorandum of understanding entitled "Developing a Spatial Framework of Ecological Units of The United States." This spatial framework is the basis for interagency coordination and collaboration in the development of ecosystem management strategies. One of the objectives in this memorandum is the development of a map of common ecological regions for the conterminous United States. The regions defined in the spatial framework will be areas within which biotic, abiotic, terrestrial, and aquatic capacities and potentials are similar. The agencies agreed to begin by exploring areas of agreement and disagreement in three federal natural-resource spatial frameworks--Major Land Resource Areas of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Hierarchy of Ecological Units of the USDA Forest Service, and Level III Ecoregions of the US Environmental Protection Agency. The explicit intention is that the framework will foster an ecological understanding of the landscape, rather than an understanding based on a single resource, single discipline, or single agency perspective. This paper describes the origin, capabilities, and limitations of three major federal agency frameworks and suggests why a common ecological framework is desirable. The scientific and programmatic benefits of common ecological regions are described, and a proposed process for development of the common framework is presented.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11531234     DOI: 10.1007/s0026702429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  16 in total

1.  The use of an ecologic classification to improve water resource planning in New Zealand.

Authors:  T H Snelder; K F D Hughey
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions.

Authors:  James M Omernik
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Toward a scientifically rigorous basis for developing mapped ecological regions.

Authors:  Gerard McMahon; Ed B Wiken; David A Gauthier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  Ecoregions and ecoregionalization: geographical and ecological perspectives.

Authors:  Thomas R Loveland; James M Merchant
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Ecoregions in the southern balkans: should their boundaries be revised?

Authors:  Stamatis Zogaris; Alcibiades N Economou; Panayotis Dimopoulos
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Division scheme for environmental management regionalization in China.

Authors:  Baorong Huang; Ting Fan; Yingming Li; Yi Wang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Strong influence of variable treatment on the performance of numerically defined ecological regions.

Authors:  Ton Snelder; Anthony Lehmann; Nicolas Lamouroux; John Leathwick; Karin Allenbach
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Prioritizing watersheds for conservation actions in the southeastern coastal plain ecoregion.

Authors:  Taeil Jang; George Vellidis; Lyubov A Kurkalova; Jan Boll; Jeffrey B Hyman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework.

Authors:  James M Omernik; Glenn E Griffith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  A flow-chart for developing water quality criteria from two field-based methods.

Authors:  Susan M Cormier; Lei Zheng; Ryan A Hill; Rachael M Novak; Colleen M Flaherty
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.