Literature DB >> 11531177

Secondary prevention of cerebral ischemia in patent foramen ovale: systematic review and meta-analysis.

M A Orgera1, P G O'Malley, A J Taylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapy for patent foramen ovale (PFO), found with increased frequency in the setting of stroke in the young, is controversial. We compiled a synthesis of the literature on therapeutic options for PFO and stroke.
METHODS: Searching MEDLINE (1966 to 1999), published abstracts, and bibliographies of primary and review articles, we identified five retrospective cohort studies that compared at least two different treatment options (antiplatelet therapy, warfarin, or surgery). Outcomes data on mode of therapy and recurrent stroke were abstracted, and pooled analysis was done using a random effects model.
RESULTS: Warfarin was superior to antiplatelet therapy in preventing recurrent ischemic events (odds ratio [OR] 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.60). Surgical PFO closure was comparable to warfarin treatment (OR 1.19; 95% CI, 0.62 to 2.27).
CONCLUSION: Available data suggest that warfarin is superior to antiplatelet therapy and comparable to surgical PFO closure for the prevention of recurrent cerebral ischemic events from paradoxical embolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11531177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  13 in total

1.  Which treatment for patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke?

Authors:  Isabelle Mahé; Charles Caulin; Jean-François Bergmann
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-07

Review 2.  Patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm in cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  Sujoy Ghosh; Arjun Kumar Ghosh; Sandip Kumar Ghosh
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Patent foramen ovale and stroke: prognosis and treatment in young adults.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Stroke and patent foramen ovale: intervene or wait.

Authors:  Arti Khistriya; Rannie Nahas; Muhammad Javaid Hameed Rahmani
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-23

Review 5.  PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke.

Authors:  Sabreena J Gillow; Vivien H Lee
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Rethinking trial strategies for stroke and patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 7.  The brain's heart - therapeutic opportunities for patent foramen ovale (PFO) and neurovascular disease.

Authors:  Mingming Ning; Eng H Lo; Pei-Chen Ning; Su-Yu Xu; David McMullin; Zareh Demirjian; Ignacio Inglessis; G William Dec; Igor Palacios; Ferdinando S Buonanno
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 8.  Current and future concepts in stroke prevention.

Authors:  Fintan O'Rourke; Naeem Dean; Naveed Akhtar; Ashfaq Shuaib
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Minimally invasive repair of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm.

Authors:  Seph Naficy; James E Klemis; Steven S Gubin; William R Funderburg; John M Craig
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-01-27

Review 10.  Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  Ravi K Mareedu; Milind S Shah; Juan E Mesa; Charles S McCauley
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2007-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.