Literature DB >> 11531074

Clinical wear performance of eight experimental dental composites over three years determined by two measuring methods.

K J Söderholm1, P Lambrechts, D Sarrett, Y Abe, M C Yang, R Labella, E Yildiz, G Willems.   

Abstract

The effect of matrix selection, filler composition, filler silanization, operator variations, and test site (dental clinic) on the wear rate of eight composites were evaluated. The wear was measured on replicas using both a microscopic and a laser scanning measuring method. The average wear rate on contact-free surfaces was 9.2 +/- 4.2 microm/month with the microscopic measurement and 8.5 +/- 3.7 microm/ month with the laser scanner over the 36-month period. The urethane-based composites performed significantly better than those which were bisGMA-based. Restorations placed at one dental clinic showed significantly lower initial wear. There was also a significant difference between the operators that was most pronounced during the first 6 months. The other variable (filler composition and silane treatment) did not affect the wear rate significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11531074     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00064.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  11 in total

1.  Dental resin materials in vivo - TEM results after one year: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gerhard Gröger; Martin Rosentritt; Michael Behr; Josef Schröder; Gerhard Handel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins.

Authors:  Liqun Cao; Xinyi Zhao; Xu Gong; Shouliang Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-06-26

3.  Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance.

Authors:  Senthamaraiselvi Palaniappan; Liesbeth Elsen; Inge Lijnen; Marleen Peumans; Bart Van Meerbeek; Paul Lambrechts
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of the fracture toughness and wear resistance of indirect composites cured by conventional post curing methods and electron beam irradiation.

Authors:  C Vaishnavi; S Kavitha; L Lakshmi Narayanan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-07

6.  Hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary and permanent teeth after wear against different dental materials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Galo; Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente; Daniel Galafassi; Maria Cristina Borsatto
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

7.  Flexural strength and microhardness of anterior composites after accelerated aging.

Authors:  Kanşad Pala; Neslihan Tekçe; Safa Tuncer; Mustafa Demirci; Fatih Öznurhan; Merve Serim
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Wear of feldspathic-ceramic-veneered zirconia posterior FPDs after 10 years.

Authors:  Ragai-Edward Matta; Constantin Motel; Elena Kirchner; Simon Paul Stelzer; Werner Adler; Manfred Wichmann; Lara Berger
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Evaluation of hardness and wear resistance of interim restorative materials.

Authors:  Omid Savabi; Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Mohamad Hossein Fathi; Amir Arsalan Navabi; Ghazal Savabi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-03

10.  Clinical wear of approximal glass ionomer restorations protected with a nanofilled self-adhesive light-cured protective coating.

Authors:  Daniela Hesse; Clarissa Calil Bonifácio; Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan; Daniela Prócida Raggio
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.