Literature DB >> 11530228

Dissociation between the attentional functions mediated via basal forebrain cholinergic and GABAergic neurons.

J A Burk1, M Sarter.   

Abstract

The role of basal forebrain corticopetal cholinergic projections in attentional functions has been extensively investigated. For example, 192 IgG-saporin-induced loss of cortical cholinergic inputs was repeatedly demonstrated to result in a selective impairment in the ability of rats to detect signals in a task designed to assess sustained attention performance. The loss of cortical cholinergic inputs correlated highly with the decrease in the hit rate. Little is known about the functions of basal forebrain non-cholinergic neurons, particularly corticopetal GABAergic neurons, largely because of the absence of specific research tools to manipulate selectively this projection. As basal forebrain lesions produced with ibotenic acid were previously observed to potently destroy non-cholinergic, particularly GABAergic neurons while producing only moderate decreases in the density of cortical cholinergic inputs, the present experiment examined the effects of such lesions on sustained attention performance and then compared these effects with the immunohistochemical and attentional consequences of selective cholinotoxic lesions produced by intra-basal forebrain infusions of 192 IgG-saporin. In contrast to the selective decrease in hits previously observed in 192 IgG-saporin-lesioned animals, the attentional performance of ibotenic acid-lesioned animals was characterized by a selective increase in the relative number of false alarms, that is 'claims' for signals in non-signal trials. Analyses of the response latencies suggested that this effect of ibotenic acid was due to impairments in the animals' ability to switch from the processing of the response rules for signal trials to those for non-signal trials. As expected, 192 IgG-saporin did not affect the number of basal forebrain parvalbumin-positive neurons, that are presumably GABAergic, but decreased cortical acetylcholinesterase-positive fiber density by over 80%. Conversely, in ibotenic acid-lesioned animals, basal forebrain parvalbumin-positive cells were decreased by 60% but cortical acetylcholinesterase-positive fiber density was only moderately reduced (less than 25%). These data form the basis for the development of the hypothesis that basal forebrain GABAergic neurons mediate executive aspects of attentional task performance. Such a function may be mediated in parallel via basal forebrain GABAergic projections to the cortex and the subthalamic nucleus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11530228     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00233-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  26 in total

Review 1.  CNTRICS final animal model task selection: control of attention.

Authors:  C Lustig; R Kozak; M Sarter; J W Young; T W Robbins
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Complex Movement Control in a Rat Model of Parkinsonian Falls: Bidirectional Control by Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons.

Authors:  Cassandra Avila; Aaron Kucinski; Martin Sarter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Monitoring cholinergic activity during attentional performance in mice heterozygous for the choline transporter: a model of cholinergic capacity limits.

Authors:  Giovanna Paolone; Caitlin S Mallory; Ajeesh Koshy Cherian; Thomas R Miller; Randy D Blakely; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Stress Regulation of Sustained Attention and the Cholinergic Attention System.

Authors:  Samantha R Eck; Song-Jun Xu; Alexander Telenson; Michael R Duggan; Robert Cole; Brittany Wicks; Joy Bergmann; Hanna Lefebo; Marni Shore; Katherine A Shepard; Michael R Akins; Vinay Parikh; Elizabeth A Heller; Debra A Bangasser
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Orexin/hypocretin modulation of the basal forebrain cholinergic system: Role in attention.

Authors:  J Fadel; J A Burk
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Neural Circuits That Mediate Selective Attention: A Comparative Perspective.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Cholinergic neurons excite cortically projecting basal forebrain GABAergic neurons.

Authors:  Chun Yang; James T McKenna; Janneke C Zant; Stuart Winston; Radhika Basheer; Ritchie E Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Distribution and intrinsic membrane properties of basal forebrain GABAergic and parvalbumin neurons in the mouse.

Authors:  James T McKenna; Chun Yang; Serena Franciosi; Stuart Winston; Kathleen K Abarr; Matthew S Rigby; Yuchio Yanagawa; Robert W McCarley; Ritchie E Brown
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Organization of food protection behavior is differentially influenced by 192 IgG-saporin lesions of either the medial septum or the nucleus basalis magnocellularis.

Authors:  Megan M Martin; Shawn S Winter; Joseph L Cheatwood; Lynniece A Carter; Jeana L Jones; Scott L Weathered; Steven J Wagner; Douglas G Wallace
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Genetic variation in cholinergic muscarinic-2 receptor gene modulates M2 receptor binding in vivo and accounts for reduced binding in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  D M Cannon; J K Klaver; S K Gandhi; G Solorio; S A Peck; K Erickson; N Akula; J Savitz; W C Eckelman; M L Furey; B J Sahakian; F J McMahon; W C Drevets
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.