Literature DB >> 11530126

Cervical cancer screening by simple visual inspection after acetic acid.

J L Belinson1, R G Pretorius, W H Zhang, L Y Wu, Y L Qiao, P Elson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection using acetic acid as a primary screen for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
METHODS: Visual inspection was done on 1997 women aged 35-45 years in a screening trial in rural China. Each women had colposcopy and at least five cervical biopsies (directed biopsy of lesions, one biopsy at 2, 4, 8, or 10 o'clock at the squamocolumnar junction in each normal quadrant, and an endocervical curettage).
RESULTS: Forty-three women had biopsy-proven CIN II, 31 had CIN III, and 12 had invasive cancer. In two women only the endocervix was positive (one with CIN II and one with CIN III). Visual inspection yielded normal results in 1445 women (72%), low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in 525 (26%), high-grade in 21 (1%), and cancer in six (0.3%). With abnormal visual inspection defined as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or worse, the sensitivity for detecting biopsy proven CIN II or worse was 71% (61 of 86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60%, 80%); the specificity was 74% (1420 of 1911, 95% CI 72%, 76%); the sensitivity was 65% for smaller lesions (37 of 57, 95% CI 51%, 77%), and 89% for larger lesions (24 of 27, 95% CI 71%, 98%) (P =.03).
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of visual inspection equaled or exceeded reported rates for conventional cervical cytology. Visual inspection and colposcopy have similar specificity profiles for CIN II and greater. The benefit of an inexpensive point-of-care diagnosis and treatment algorithm will be a powerful incentive to pursue visual inspection for cervical cancer screening in developing countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11530126     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01454-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  27 in total

1.  Cervical cancer as a priority for prevention in different world regions: an evaluation using years of life lost.

Authors:  Binh H Yang; Freddie I Bray; D Maxwell Parkin; John W Sellors; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim; Mohamad Farid Aziz; Uma K Devi; Hextan Y S Ngan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Seung Cheol Kim; Tomoyasu Kato; Hee Sug Ryu; Shingo Fujii; Yoon Soon Lee; Jong Hyeok Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Young Tae Kim; Kung-Liahng Wang; Taek Sang Lee; Kimio Ushijima; Sang-Goo Shin; Yin Nin Chia; Sarikapan Wilailak; Sang Yoon Park; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Toshiharu Kamura; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Performance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing as a primary screen for cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 17 population-based studies from China.

Authors:  Fang-Hui Zhao; Margaret Jane Lin; Feng Chen; Shang-Ying Hu; Rong Zhang; Jerome L Belinson; John W Sellors; Silvia Franceschi; You-Lin Qiao; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Screen-and-treat approach to cervical cancer prevention using visual inspection with acetic acid and cryotherapy: experiences, perceptions, and beliefs from demonstration projects in Peru, Uganda, and Vietnam.

Authors:  Proma Paul; Jennifer L Winkler; Rosario M Bartolini; Mary E Penny; Trinh Thu Huong; Le Thi Nga; Edward Kumakech; Emmanuel Mugisha; Jose Jeronimo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-11-11

5.  Andriod Device-Based Cervical Cancer Screening for Resource-Poor Settings.

Authors:  Vidya Kudva; Keerthana Prasad; Shyamala Guruvare
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Hybrid Transfer Learning for Classification of Uterine Cervix Images for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Vidya Kudva; Keerthana Prasad; Shyamala Guruvare
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  The Peru cervical cancer prevention study (PERCAPS): community-based participatory research in Manchay, Peru.

Authors:  Kimberly L Levinson; Carolina Abuelo; Eunice Chyung; Jorge Salmeron; Suzanne E Belinson; Carlos Vallejos Sologuren; Carlos Santos Ortiz; Maria Jose Vallejos; Jerome L Belinson
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.

Authors:  Qin-Jing Pan; Shang-ying Hu; Xun Zhang; Pu-wa Ci; Wen-hua Zhang; Hui-qin Guo; Jian Cao; Fang-hui Zhao; Alice Lytwyn; You-lin Qiao
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Optical imaging for cervical cancer detection: solutions for a continuing global problem.

Authors:  Nadhi Thekkek; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  An evaluation by midwives and gynecologists of treatability of cervical lesions by cryotherapy among human papillomavirus-positive women.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Mark Schiffman; Sydney Adadevoh; Manuel J Alvarez Larraondo; Bandit Chumworathayi; Sandra Vargas Lejarza; Luis Villegas Araya; Francisco Garcia; Scott R Budihas; Rodney Long; Hormuzd A Katki; Rolando Herrero; Robert D Burk; Jose Jeronimo
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.