T Usui1, N Tanimoto, M Takagi, S Hasegawa, H Abe. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Niigata University School of Medicine, 1-757 Asahimachi, Niigata 951-8510, Japan. usuit@med.niigata-u.ac.jp
Abstract
PURPOSE: To estimate retinal function in Bietti crystalline chorioretinal dystrophy using the electroretinogram. METHODS: In this observational case series, the scotopic and photopic electroretinograms in three Japanese female patients (case 1, 55 years old; case 2, 56 years old; case 3, 47 years old) who showed bilateral crystalline retinal deposits but no corneal deposits were recorded. The rod and cone a-waves were analyzed by using the method described by Hood and Birch (1995, 1997). The parameters Rm(p3) (maximum a-wave amplitude) and S (sensitivity) were calculated. RESULTS: In case 1, the rod Rm(p3) was decreased in both eyes. The rod S in the right eye was within the normal range, but that in the left eye was significantly reduced. Although the cone Rm(p3) was decreased, the cone S was within the normal range. In case 2, the rod and cone Rm(p3) was reduced, but the rod and cone S was within the normal range in both eyes. In case 3, the rod and cone Rm(p3) and S were within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Electroretinograms illustrated different disease stages, however, no eye with normal Rm(p3) and decreased S was found in rods and cones. In the early stages of this disease, decreased numbers of photoreceptors and/or outer segment shortening may be present while phototransduction remains normal. As the damage to the retina progresses, phototransduction becomes severely affected. Because reduced cone S was not observed in our cases, cones may be less involved than rods in this disease.
PURPOSE: To estimate retinal function in Bietti crystalline chorioretinal dystrophy using the electroretinogram. METHODS: In this observational case series, the scotopic and photopic electroretinograms in three Japanese female patients (case 1, 55 years old; case 2, 56 years old; case 3, 47 years old) who showed bilateral crystalline retinal deposits but no corneal deposits were recorded. The rod and cone a-waves were analyzed by using the method described by Hood and Birch (1995, 1997). The parameters Rm(p3) (maximum a-wave amplitude) and S (sensitivity) were calculated. RESULTS: In case 1, the rod Rm(p3) was decreased in both eyes. The rod S in the right eye was within the normal range, but that in the left eye was significantly reduced. Although the cone Rm(p3) was decreased, the cone S was within the normal range. In case 2, the rod and cone Rm(p3) was reduced, but the rod and cone S was within the normal range in both eyes. In case 3, the rod and cone Rm(p3) and S were within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Electroretinograms illustrated different disease stages, however, no eye with normal Rm(p3) and decreased S was found in rods and cones. In the early stages of this disease, decreased numbers of photoreceptors and/or outer segment shortening may be present while phototransduction remains normal. As the damage to the retina progresses, phototransduction becomes severely affected. Because reduced cone S was not observed in our cases, cones may be less involved than rods in this disease.
Authors: Nicole M Fuerst; Leona Serrano; Grace Han; Jessica I W Morgan; Albert M Maguire; Bart P Leroy; Benjamin J Kim; Tomas S Aleman Journal: Ophthalmic Genet Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 1.803