Literature DB >> 11529607

Are qualitative methods misunderstood?

D Ezzy1.   

Abstract

Qualitative research methods are increasingly utilised by health researchers. Along with this the criteria for assessing the quality of qualitative research are changing from a natural science model to an interpretative social science model. This is a product of the realisation by health researchers that qualitative methods utilise a different epistemology to statistical methods. I demonstrate that a recent article in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health draws on a now outdated natural science methodology of assessing bias in focus groups. Drawing on interpretativist social science theory and recent work in the British Medical Joumal I argue for the importance of examining the social contexts through which qualitative data is produced.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11529607     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00582.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  1 in total

1.  Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods.

Authors:  Michaela Coenen; Tanja A Stamm; Gerold Stucki; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.147

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.