Literature DB >> 11528607

Fistula-in-ano in infants: is nonoperative management effective?

J T Oh1, A Han, S J Han, S H Choi, E H Hwang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recently, a number of studies have reported positive results from the nonoperative management of fistula-in-ano in infancy, although it has not been of use in all patients. The purpose of this study was to discern the effective treatment methods of fistula-in-ano in infants.
METHODS: A retrospective review was done of 310 children who required operative management for fistula-in-ano or perianal abscess between January 1991 and July 2000. Eighteen patients displayed an onset of symptoms at less than 1 year of age and a duration of symptoms longer than 12 months. The authors analyzed these patients' medical records.
RESULTS: All patients were boys. The mean duration of the symptoms was 26.6 +/- 27.5 months. Fourteen patients had shown an onset of symptoms at less than 6 months of age. The longest duration was 10 years. The patients showed conservative periods of over 12 months because their parents did not want them to undergo surgery. The disease in these patients followed 2 patterns. One (6 patients) was an onset of symptoms followed by a silent fistula-in-ano state. The other (12 patients) was an onset of symptoms followed by an intermittent relapse of inflammation. All patients underwent fistulotomy, and none of them had recurrent fistula during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the advantages of a nonoperative management of fistula-in-ano in infants include the avoidance of general anesthesia and surgical intervention, the lesions cannot be cured by a period of conservation. Surgical management is more effective in respect to the time factor. Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11528607     DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.26372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  7 in total

1.  [Perianal abscess and anal fistula in infancy and childhood. A congenital etiology?].

Authors:  T Meyer; M Weininger; B Höcht
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in children: clinical characteristic, management and outcome.

Authors:  Cağatay Evrim Afşarlar; Ayşe Karaman; Gönül Tanır; Ibrahim Karaman; Engin Yılmaz; Derya Erdoğan; Haşim Ata Maden; Yusuf Hakan Cavuşoğlu; Ismet Faruk Ozgüner
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Usefulness of bFGF spray in the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano.

Authors:  Masayuki Kubota; Yutaka Hirayama; Naoki Okuyama
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Intermediate-Term Evaluation of Initial Non-Surgical Management of Pediatric Perianal Abscess and Fistula-In-Ano.

Authors:  Cailong Kang; Guobin Liu; Rensen Zhang; Jingyu Chenk; Chengwei Yan; Chunbao Guo
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.853

Review 5.  A systematic review of the management of anal fistula in infants.

Authors:  S H Emile; H Elfeki; M Abdelnaby
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Fistula in ano in infants: who recurs?

Authors:  Nathan M Novotny; Monica J S Mann; Frederick J Rescorla
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Long-term results of seton placement for fistula-in-ano in infants.

Authors:  Mikiya Inoue; Kiminobu Sugito; Taro Ikeda; Hiroyuki Kawashima; Manabu Hanada; Takeshi Furuya; Kensuke Ohashi; Tsugumichi Koshinaga
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.