C M Friedenreich1, K S Courneya, H E Bryant. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Prevention and Screening, Alberta Cancer Board, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. chrisf@cancerboard.ab.ca
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the influence of frequency, duration, and intensity of physical activity on risk of breast cancer and to compare breast cancer risks associated with self-reported versus assigned intensity levels of activity. METHODS: A population-based case-control study of 1233 incident breast cancer cases and 1241 controls was conducted in Alberta between 1995 and 1997. The frequency, duration and intensity of occupational, household, and recreational activities were measured throughout lifetime using the Lifetime Total Physical Activity Questionnaire and cognitive interviewing methods. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios and a full assessment of confounding and effect modification was undertaken. Odds ratios for self-reported and compendium-based assigned levels of activity were compared for lifetime total activity and by type of activity. RESULTS: Breast cancer risk reductions were comparable when self-reported and assigned intensity values were used, although the results and trends were more evident with the assigned intensity data. Moderate-intensity occupational and household activities decreased breast cancer risk, whereas recreational activity, at any intensity level, did not contribute to a breast cancer risk reduction. CONCLUSION: This study found that moderate-intensity activities were the major contributors to the decrease in breast cancer risk found in this study and that risk reductions were more evident when the frequency and duration of activity alone were modeled. Of the three types of activity considered, the greatest risk reductions observed were for occupational and household activities.
PURPOSE: To examine the influence of frequency, duration, and intensity of physical activity on risk of breast cancer and to compare breast cancer risks associated with self-reported versus assigned intensity levels of activity. METHODS: A population-based case-control study of 1233 incident breast cancer cases and 1241 controls was conducted in Alberta between 1995 and 1997. The frequency, duration and intensity of occupational, household, and recreational activities were measured throughout lifetime using the Lifetime Total Physical Activity Questionnaire and cognitive interviewing methods. Unconditional logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios and a full assessment of confounding and effect modification was undertaken. Odds ratios for self-reported and compendium-based assigned levels of activity were compared for lifetime total activity and by type of activity. RESULTS:Breast cancer risk reductions were comparable when self-reported and assigned intensity values were used, although the results and trends were more evident with the assigned intensity data. Moderate-intensity occupational and household activities decreased breast cancer risk, whereas recreational activity, at any intensity level, did not contribute to a breast cancer risk reduction. CONCLUSION: This study found that moderate-intensity activities were the major contributors to the decrease in breast cancer risk found in this study and that risk reductions were more evident when the frequency and duration of activity alone were modeled. Of the three types of activity considered, the greatest risk reductions observed were for occupational and household activities.
Authors: Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Elisa R Torres; Siobhan M Hoscheidt; Barbara B Bendlin; Vincent A Magnotta; Gabriel D Lancaster; Roger L Brown; Sergio Paradiso Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2019 May/Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Rebecca J Cleveland; Sybil M Eng; June Stevens; Patrick T Bradshaw; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Marilie D Gammon Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Christine M Friedenreich; Linda S Cook; Anthony M Magliocco; Máire A Duggan; Kerry S Courneya Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Sriram Yennurajalingam; Supakarn Tayjasanant; Dave Balachandran; Nikhil S Padhye; Janet L Williams; Diane D Liu; Susan Frisbee-Hume; Eduardo Bruera Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Tricia M Peters; Steven C Moore; Gretchen L Gierach; Nicholas J Wareham; Ulf Ekelund; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Michael F Leitzmann Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 4.430