Literature DB >> 11528272

Correlation between MRI findings and second-Look operation in cholesteatoma surgery.

T Kimitsuki1, Y Suda, H Kawano, T Tono, S Komune.   

Abstract

Two-staged intact canal wall tympanoplasty is a common operation for treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma. MRI provides better tissue differentiation of the middle ear and/or mastoid, which often become occupied with soft density tissue after the first operation. If MRI was able to detect the presence of a recurrent or residual cholesteatoma with sufficient sensitivity and specificity, this may facilitate a decrease in the number of second-look procedures. This study compared MRI findings to surgical findings at second-look surgery and calculated the correlation rates between the two sets of findings. Thirty ears having undergone intact canal wall tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma at the initial operation were examined by MRI prior to the second look. Otoscopic findings of the tympanic membrane were nonsuspect in all cases. The true positive rate was 11/30 (37%) and the true negative rate was 10/30 (33%), leading to a radiosurgical correlation of 70%, whereas the false positive rate was 6/30 (20%) and the false negative rate was 3/30 (10%). This indicates that 30% of the MRI findings were incorrect. Therefore, at the present time, MRI does not appear as a likely replacement for second-look surgery in cases of intact canal wall tympanoplasty. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11528272     DOI: 10.1159/000055760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec        ISSN: 0301-1569            Impact factor:   1.538


  8 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of the postoperative middle ear.

Authors:  Marc T Williams; Denis Ayache
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas.

Authors:  K Baráth; A M Huber; P Stämpfli; Z Varga; S Kollias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the management of cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Mudit Jindal; Jayesh Doshi; Manoj Srivastav; David Wilcock; Richard Irving; Ranit De
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma evaluation.

Authors:  K M Schwartz; J I Lane; B D Bolster; B A Neff
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Predictive validity of MRI in detecting and following cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Milan Profant; Katarína Sláviková; Zuzana Kabátová; Peter Slezák; Iveta Waczulíková
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Comparison of echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging for the detection of residual cholesteatoma.

Authors:  F Venail; A Bonafe; V Poirrier; M Mondain; A Uziel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Vercruysse; Bert De Foer; Marc Pouillon; Thomas Somers; Jan Casselman; Erwin Offeciers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the postoperative management of cholesteatomas.

Authors:  Carlos Toyama; Claudia da Costa Leite; Iulo Sérgio Baraúna Filho; Rubens Vuono de Brito Neto; Ricardo Fereira Bento; Giovanni Guido Cerri; Eloisa Maria Melo Santiago Gebrim
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.