Literature DB >> 11528189

Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: an update of the miami experience.

A Vaidya1, M S Soloway.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy is a very common office procedure for most urologists. Pain or discomfort associated with this procedure has been addressed recently by the use of periprostatic local anesthesia. We re-address this issue with an update of our experience and emphasize the crucial steps that contribute to the success of the technique. We also analyzed the subsequent intraoperative effects of injecting lidocaine into the area of the neurovascular bundles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 1999 and December 2000, 200 patients underwent TRUS-guided biopsies of the prostate. Patients were properly consented and subjected to the procedure using periprostatic nerve block with 10 cm3 of 1% plain lidocaine. An 'ultrasonographic wheal' was created between the rectal wall and the posterior aspect of the prostate and three or four different locations along the neurovascular bundles. Pain scores were evaluated with the visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: TRUS biopsy of the prostate was performed in 200 consecutive patients using periprostatic local anesthesia, 40 patients (20%) had undergone previous prostate biopsy without anesthesia. The age of patients ranged from 44 to 75 years (mean 67). The number of biopsies ranged from 6 to 14. Mean time from introduction of the probe per rectum to the end of the procedure was 18 min. There were no instances of clinical infection, significant bleeding, urinary retention, diaphoresis or hypotension. The visual analogue scale ranged from 1 to 3 (mean 2). Intraoperative findings in 62 patients who subsequently underwent nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy were no different from the patients who had biopsies without a local anesthetic.
CONCLUSION: TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate is the procedure of choice for diagnosing prostate cancer. This procedure can be accomplished with minimal pain with the use of periprostatic local anesthesia. It is an easy, safe, acceptable and reproducible technique that we believe should be considered for all patients undergoing TRUS biopsy regardless of age or number of biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11528189     DOI: 10.1159/000049763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  4 in total

1.  Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

2.  Efficacy and cost analysis of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy under monitored anesthesia.

Authors:  Sung Gu Kang; Bum Sik Tae; Sam Hong Min; Young Hwii Ko; Seok Ho Kang; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Effect of Sedation Anesthesia With Intravenous Propofol on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.

Authors:  Hee Youn Kim; Young Hyo Choi; Seung-Ju Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 5.354

Review 4.  Pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of periprostatic nerve block: what radiologists should know.

Authors:  Babar Nazir
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.