Literature DB >> 11527480

Self-reported social and emotional impact of urinary incontinence.

N H Fultz1, A R Herzog.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Incontinence-specific and generic measures of well-being were regressed on potential predictors to identify incontinent respondents at risk for psychosocial distress and to understand the relationship between urinary incontinence (UI) and other determinants of social and emotional status.
DESIGN: Survey data were collected May 1994 through April 1996.
SETTING: Telephone interviews as a supplement to a nationally representative monthly consumer survey. PARTICIPANTS: Analyses were based on 1,116 continent and 206 incontinent respondents age 40 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Incontinent respondents self-reported the extent to which urine loss restricted social activities or affected their feelings about themselves. All respondents were asked whether they felt depressed, lonely, or sad. Covariates included sex, age, race, education, social desirability, health status, frequency of urine loss, quantity of loss, and urgency.
RESULTS: The majority of incontinent respondents reported that urine loss did not restrict activities or diminish self-esteem. Incontinent respondents who were younger, male, less educated, lower in social desirability, in poorer health, or losing greater quantities of urine were more likely to report psychosocial distress, although these correlates were not consistently significant. Compared with continent respondents, significantly higher percentages of incontinent respondents reported feeling depressed, lonely, or sad. In the multivariate models, incontinence retained an independent association with loneliness, but not with sadness or depression.
CONCLUSION: Even though the direct psychosocial impact of urine loss may be minor in many cases, UI is associated with a constellation of physical and behavioral factors that can impose a social and emotional burden. This suggests that UI cannot be adequately evaluated or treated without consideration of the patient's overall quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11527480     DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49179.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  31 in total

Review 1.  A review of social isolation: an important but underassessed condition in older adults.

Authors:  Nicholas R Nicholson
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2012-06

Review 2.  The puzzle of overactive bladder: controversies, inconsistencies, and insights.

Authors:  Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06-27

3.  Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Research Consortium Focus Group Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities, and Experiences of Bladder Health.

Authors:  Lisa Kane Low; Beverly Rosa Williams; Deepa R Camenga; Jeni Hebert-Beirne; Sonya S Brady; Diane K Newman; Aimee S James; Cecilia T Hardacker; Jesse Nodora; Sarah E Linke; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Urinary incontinence, depression, and economic outcomes in a cohort of women between the ages of 54 and 65 years.

Authors:  Kristin J Hung; Christopher S Awtrey; Alexander C Tsai
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Racial differences in self-reported healthcare seeking and treatment for urinary incontinence in community-dwelling women from the EPI Study.

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Divya A Patel; Janis M Miller; John O Delancey; Dee E Fenner
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  A quality of life survey of individuals with urinary incontinence who visit a self-help website: implications for those seeking healthcare information.

Authors:  Ronald H Rozensky; Steven M Tovian; Cheryle B Gartley; Thom R Nichols; Matthew Layton
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2013-09

7.  The association between urinary and fecal incontinence and social isolation in older women.

Authors:  Sallis O Yip; Madeline A Dick; Alexandra M McPencow; Deanna K Martin; Maria M Ciarleglio; Elisabeth A Erekson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Differences between older Chinese men and women from Hong Kong in the impact of urinary incontinence on their lives.

Authors:  Jik-Joen Lee
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2009-09

9.  Evaluation of a urinary incontinence unit for community-dwelling older adults in Barcelona: implementation and improvement of the perceived impact on daily life, frequency and severity of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jaume Padrós; Teresa Peris; Antoni Salvà; Michael D Denkinger; Laura Coll-Planas
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 10.  Pharmacotherapy for stress urinary incontinence : present and future options.

Authors:  Norman R Zinner; Stephanie C Koke; Lars Viktrup
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.