Literature DB >> 11526981

Strain and model differences in behavioral outcomes after spinal cord injury in rat.

C D Mills1, B C Hains, K M Johnson, C E Hulsebosch.   

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in loss of function below the level of injury and the development of chronic central pain (CCP) syndromes. Since different strains may develop and express chronic pain behaviors differently, we evaluated behavioral outcomes (locomotor recovery and the development of mechanical and thermal allodynia) in three commonly used strains of rats (Long-Evans, Wistar, and Sprague-Dawley) using two models of SCI. The two models examined were contusion at T10 (NYU impactor, 12.5 mm height) and the T13 hemisection. Mechanical stimulation (von Frey filaments) revealed significantly lower baseline responses for Long-Evans rats and significantly higher baseline paw withdrawal latencies to thermal stimulation for Wistar rats compared to the other strains. Following contusion SCI, Long-Evans rats had the highest percentage of animals that developed mechanical allodynia (73%), while Sprague-Dawley rats had the highest percentages (75%) following hemisection SCI. Interestingly, the Sprague-Dawley rats had the highest percentage (87%) to develop thermal allodynia following contusion SCI, while 100% of both Long-Evans and Sprague Dawley rats developed thermal allodynia in the hemisection model. Locomotor recovery after SCI was similar for each model in that Long-Evans rats recovered slower and to a lesser extent than the other strains. In each model, Sprague-Dawley rats recovered faster and achieved greater function. Overall, the hemisection model produced a larger percentage of animals that developed CCP and had greater responses to mechanical stimulation. Thus, it appears that strain selection has a greater impact on locomotor recovery and model selection has a greater impact on the development of CCP following SCI. Furthermore, these results suggest that genetic factors may play a role in recovery following SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11526981     DOI: 10.1089/089771501316919111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  33 in total

1.  Validity of acute and chronic tactile sensory testing after spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Megan Ryan Detloff; Leslie M Clark; Karen J Hutchinson; Anne D Kloos; Lesley C Fisher; D Michele Basso
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 2.  Chemokines: integrators of pain and inflammation.

Authors:  Fletcher A White; Sonia K Bhangoo; Richard J Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Host reaction to poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) scaffolds in a small spinal cord injury model.

Authors:  Hong Ying Li; Tobias Führmann; Yue Zhou; Paul D Dalton
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Cellular transplantation strategies for spinal cord injury and translational neurobiology.

Authors:  Paul J Reier
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-10

5.  Chronic spontaneous activity generated in the somata of primary nociceptors is associated with pain-related behavior after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Supinder S Bedi; Qing Yang; Robyn J Crook; Junhui Du; Zizhen Wu; Harvey M Fishman; Raymond J Grill; Susan M Carlton; Edgar T Walters
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Recovery of airway protective behaviors after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Donald C Bolser; Stephanie C Jefferson; Melanie J Rose; Nicole J Tester; Paul J Reier; David D Fuller; Paul W Davenport; Dena R Howland
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 1.931

Review 7.  Locomotor dysfunction and pain: the scylla and charybdis of fiber sprouting after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ronald Deumens; Elbert A J Joosten; Stephen G Waxman; Bryan C Hains
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Differences in forebrain activation in two strains of rat at rest and after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Pamela E Paulson; A L Gorman; Robert P Yezierski; Kenneth L Casey; Thomas J Morrow
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Intrathecal morphine attenuates recovery of function after a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Michelle A Hook; Georgina Moreno; Sarah Woller; Denise Puga; Kevin Hoy; Robyn Balden; James W Grau
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Regional energy metabolism following short-term neural stem cell transplantation into the injured spinal cord.

Authors:  Angelika E M Mautes; Jiankun Liu; Jörg Brandewiede; Jérôme Manville; Evan Snyder; Melitta Schachner
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.