K J Salaymeh1, A Banerjee. 1. Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pathologic studies and surgical observations of thickened aortic walls have suggested an increase in aortic stiffness in patients with Williams syndrome. However, in vivo objective evaluation of aortic and arterial stiffness in Williams syndrome are lacking. Moreover, systemic hypertension, although prevalent in Williams syndrome, does not have a well-defined mechanism in this syndrome. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantitate aortic stiffness and arterial compliance in an objective manner, as well as to determine their roles in development of hypertension, in children with Williams syndrome. METHODS: We studied 13 patients with Williams syndrome (aged 3-12 years) and 16 age-matched control subjects. Aortic stiffness was calculated from the beta index as follows: beta = (ln[P(s)/P(d)])/ ([D(s) - D(d)]/D(d)), where P(s) and P(d) are systolic and diastolic blood pressures and D(s) and D(d) are systolic and diastolic aortic dimensions, respectively. Arterial compliance (C) was calculated by the area method: C= (A(d) x CO x CL) / (A(t) x [P(es) - P(d)]), where A(t) is the total area and A(d) is the area under the diastolic portion of the arterial pulse tracing, CO is the cardiac output, CL is the cycle length, and P(es) is aortic end-systolic pressure. RESULTS: In patients with Williams syndrome, the beta index was 2-fold higher than in control patients (9.02 +/- 3.15 vs 4.43 +/- 0.96, P <.005). Moreover, there was a strong positive correlation between the beta index and the systolic blood pressure (r = 0.8 and P <.0001). Compliance was decreased by 42% (0.41 +/- 0.11 vs 0.71 +/- 0.10 mL/mm Hg, P <.05), suggesting decreased arterial compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that in vivo arterial stiffness is increased in patients with Williams syndrome. We speculate that increased arterial stiffness may be the predisposing cause of systemic hypertension in Williams syndrome.
BACKGROUND: Pathologic studies and surgical observations of thickened aortic walls have suggested an increase in aortic stiffness in patients with Williams syndrome. However, in vivo objective evaluation of aortic and arterial stiffness in Williams syndrome are lacking. Moreover, systemic hypertension, although prevalent in Williams syndrome, does not have a well-defined mechanism in this syndrome. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantitate aortic stiffness and arterial compliance in an objective manner, as well as to determine their roles in development of hypertension, in children with Williams syndrome. METHODS: We studied 13 patients with Williams syndrome (aged 3-12 years) and 16 age-matched control subjects. Aortic stiffness was calculated from the beta index as follows: beta = (ln[P(s)/P(d)])/ ([D(s) - D(d)]/D(d)), where P(s) and P(d) are systolic and diastolic blood pressures and D(s) and D(d) are systolic and diastolic aortic dimensions, respectively. Arterial compliance (C) was calculated by the area method: C= (A(d) x CO x CL) / (A(t) x [P(es) - P(d)]), where A(t) is the total area and A(d) is the area under the diastolic portion of the arterial pulse tracing, CO is the cardiac output, CL is the cycle length, and P(es) is aortic end-systolic pressure. RESULTS: In patients with Williams syndrome, the beta index was 2-fold higher than in control patients (9.02 +/- 3.15 vs 4.43 +/- 0.96, P <.005). Moreover, there was a strong positive correlation between the beta index and the systolic blood pressure (r = 0.8 and P <.0001). Compliance was decreased by 42% (0.41 +/- 0.11 vs 0.71 +/- 0.10 mL/mm Hg, P <.05), suggesting decreased arterial compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that in vivo arterial stiffness is increased in patients with Williams syndrome. We speculate that increased arterial stiffness may be the predisposing cause of systemic hypertension in Williams syndrome.
Authors: Beth A Kozel; Joshua R Danback; Jessica L Waxler; Russell H Knutsen; Lisa de Las Fuentes; Gyorgy S Reusz; Eva Kis; Ami B Bhatt; Barbara R Pober Journal: Hypertension Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Beth A Kozel; Russell H Knutsen; Li Ye; Christopher H Ciliberto; Thomas J Broekelmann; Robert P Mecham Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Yang Jiao; Guangxin Li; Arina Korneva; Alexander W Caulk; Lingfeng Qin; Matthew R Bersi; Qingle Li; Wei Li; Robert P Mecham; Jay D Humphrey; George Tellides Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Gilles Faury; Mylène Pezet; Russell H Knutsen; Walter A Boyle; Scott P Heximer; Sean E McLean; Robert K Minkes; Kendall J Blumer; Attila Kovacs; Daniel P Kelly; Dean Y Li; Barry Starcher; Robert P Mecham Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 14.808