Literature DB >> 11525849

Measurement of depth of burns by laser Doppler perfusion imaging.

E J Droog1, W Steenbergen, F Sjöberg.   

Abstract

Laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI), is a further development in laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Its advantage is that it enables assessment of microvascular blood flow in a predefined skin area rather than, as for LDF, in one place. In many ways this method seems to be more promising than LDF in the assessment of burn wounds. However, several methodological issues that are inherent in the LDPI technique, and are relevant for the assessment of burn depth, must be clarified. These include the effect of scanning distance, curvature of the tissue, thickness of topical wound dressings, and pathophysiological effects of skin colour, blisters, and wound fluids. Furthermore, we soon realised that to examine the perfusion image generated by LDPI adequately the process of analysis was appreciably improved by the simultaneous use of digital photography. In the present investigation we used both in vitro and in vivo models and also examined burned patients, and found that the listed factors all significantly affected the LDPI output signal. However, if these factors are known to the examiner, most of them can be adjusted for. If the technique is further improved by minimizing such effects and by reducing the practical difficulties of applying it to a burned patient in the burns unit, the technique may find uses in everyday clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11525849     DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4179(01)00021-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  14 in total

1.  Rapid tissue viability evaluation using methemoglobin as a biomarker in burns.

Authors:  General Leung; Dragos Duta; Julie Perry; Lorenzo Leonardi; Joel Fish; Karen Cross
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 2.  State of the art in burn treatment.

Authors:  Bishara S Atiyeh; S William Gunn; Shady N Hayek
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Burn wound depth assessment--is laser Doppler imaging the best measurement tool available?

Authors:  Anirban Mandal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Application of temporal correlation algorithm to interpret laser Doppler perfusion imaging.

Authors:  M Z Ansari; A Mujeeb
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 5.  Critical Review of Noninvasive Optical Technologies for Wound Imaging.

Authors:  Maanasa Jayachandran; Suset Rodriguez; Elizabeth Solis; Jiali Lei; Anuradha Godavarty
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  [Microcirculatory monitoring of sepsis].

Authors:  A Bauer; D Bruegger; F Christ
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Laser Doppler imager (LDI) scanner and intradermal injection for in vivo pharmacology in human skin microcirculation: responses to acetylcholine, endothelin-1 and their repeatability.

Authors:  Anabelle M Opazo Saez; Frank Mosel; Jens Nürnberger; U Rushentsova; Mario Gössl; Anna Mitchell; Rafael F Schäfers; Thomas Philipp; René R Wenzel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Altered skin blood perfusion in areas with non blanchable erythema: an explorative study.

Authors:  Margareta Lindgren; Lars-Ake Malmqvist; Folke Sjöberg; Anna-Christina Ek
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Modalities for the assessment of burn wound depth.

Authors:  Lara Devgan; Satyanarayan Bhat; S Aylward; Robert J Spence
Journal:  J Burns Wounds       Date:  2006-02-15

10.  Combined reflectance confocal microscopy/optical coherence tomography imaging for skin burn assessment.

Authors:  Nicusor Iftimia; R Daniel Ferguson; Mircea Mujat; Ankit H Patel; Ellen Ziyi Zhang; William Fox; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.