Literature DB >> 11525465

Simplification as a trend in synapsid cranial evolution.

C A Sidor1.   

Abstract

The prevalence and meaning of morphological trends in the fossil record have undergone renewed scrutiny in recent years. Studies have typically focused on trends in body size evolution, which have yielded conflicting results, and have only rarely addressed the question as to whether other morphological characteristics show persistent directionality over long time scales. I investigated reduction in number of skull and lower jaw bones (through loss or fusion) over approximately 150 million years of premammalian synapsid history. The results of a new skull simplification metric (SSM), which is defined as a function of the number of distinct elements, show that pronounced simplification is evident on both temporal (i.e., stratigraphic) and phylogenetic scales. Postcranial evolution exhibits a similar pattern. Skull size, in contrast, bears little relationship with the number of distinct skull bones present. Synapsid skulls carried close to their observed maximum number of elements for most of the Late Carboniferous and Early Permian. The SSM decreased in the Late Permian but, coincident with the radiation of early therapsids, the range of observed SSM values widened during this interval. From derived nonmammalian cynodonts in the Early Triassic through the earliest mammals in the Early Jurassic, both the minimum and maximum SSM decreased. Data from three representative modern mammals (platypus, opossum, and human) suggest that this trend continues through the Cenozoic. In a phylogenetic context, the number of skull elements present in a taxon shows a significant negative relationship with the number of branching events passed from the root of the tree; more deeply embedded taxa have smaller SSM scores. This relationship holds for various synapsid subgroups as well. Although commonly ascribed to the effects of long-term selection, evolutionary trends can alternatively reflect an underlying intrinsic bias in morphological change. In the case of synapsid skull bones (and those of some other tetrapods lineages), the rare production of novel, or neomorphic, elements may have contributed to the observed trend toward skeletal simplification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11525465     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00663.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  27 in total

1.  Evolution of complex fruiting-body morphologies in homobasidiomycetes.

Authors:  David S Hibbett; Manfred Binder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Paleontological and developmental evidence resolve the homology and dual embryonic origin of a mammalian skull bone, the interparietal.

Authors:  Daisuke Koyabu; Wolfgang Maier; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Disconnecting bones within the jaw-otic network modules underlies mammalian middle ear evolution.

Authors:  Aitor Navarro-Díaz; Borja Esteve-Altava; Diego Rasskin-Gutman
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  A re-assessment of the oldest therapsid Raranimus confirms its status as a basal member of the clade and fills Olson's gap.

Authors:  A Duhamel; J Benoit; B S Rubidge; J Liu
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-06-11

Review 5.  A century of development.

Authors:  Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  The role of the sutures in biomechanical dynamic simulation of a macaque cranial finite element model: implications for the evolution of craniofacial form.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Sarah A Wood; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Uriel Zapata; Craig D Byron; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Kristina Aldridge; Jeffrey L Marsh; Daniel Govier; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Craniofacial skeletal response to encephalization: How do we know what we think we know?

Authors:  Kate M Lesciotto; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  The effect of dietary adaption on cranial morphological integration in capuchins (order Primates, genus Cebus).

Authors:  Jana Makedonska; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Phenotypic integration of neurocranium and brain.

Authors:  Joan T Richtsmeier; Kristina Aldridge; Valerie B DeLeon; Jayesh Panchal; Alex A Kane; Jeffrey L Marsh; Peng Yan; Theodore M Cole
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 2.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.