Literature DB >> 11524060

Survival benefit with an implanted defibrillator in relation to mortality risk in chronic coronary heart disease.

A J Moss1, Y Fadl, W Zareba, D S Cannom, W J Hall.   

Abstract

Although improved patient survival has been reported in several randomized trials with the implanted cardioverter-defibrillator, <15% of patients treated with defibrillators during trials receive life-saving benefit from this therapy. We evaluated the survival benefit from defibrillator therapy in relation to the severity of the mortality risk in patients with coronary heart disease. Using data from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial, we partitioned the study population into high- and low-risk subsets for each of 3 physiologically meaningful risk factors (ejection fraction, QRS duration, and history of heart failure requiring therapy). Risk of death was evaluated by Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses in patients with single and multiple risk factors. The defibrillator was associated with a significant (p = 0.002) reduction in mortality only in high-risk subsets with ejection fraction <0.26, QRS duration > or =0.12 second, and history of heart failure requiring treatment. The Cox hazard ratio for the risk of death progressively increased >1.0 as a function of the number of risk factors present. Defibrillator therapy was associated with a progressive reduction in the hazard ratio <1.0 (improved survival) at each increased level of mortality risk. Patients at the highest mortality risk (all 3 risk factors; hazard ratio 4.33) achieved the largest mortality reduction (hazard ratio 0.20) from defibrillator therapy. In patients with chronic coronary heart disease, the magnitude of the survival benefit from the implanted defibrillator is directly related to the severity of cardiac dysfunction and its associated mortality risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11524060     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01729-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  The ECG: predicting cardiac events after myocardial infarction with a brief historical perspective.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  MADIT-II and implications for noninvasive electrophysiologic testing.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  The DAVID trial and its implications: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Brian Olshansky
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Does cardiac resynchronization therapy prevent heart failure?

Authors:  Ayesha Hasan
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2011-03

5.  Enhanced external counterpulsation therapy: significant clinical improvement without electrophysiologic remodeling.

Authors:  Charles A Henrikson; Nisha Chandra-Strobos
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: trials in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Alfred E Buxton; Kristin E Ellison; Malcolm M Kirk; Bryan Frain; Charles Koo; Gaurang Gandhi; Sameh Khouzam
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Usefulness of nonlinear analysis of ECG signals for prediction of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia by programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with complex spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Ornella Durin; Claudio Pedrinazzi; Giorgio Donato; Rita Pizzi; Giuseppe Inama
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 8.  Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Neil T Srinivasan; Richard J Schilling
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-06

9.  Improved survival of patients with coronary artery disease and low ejection fraction with ICD implantation versus conventional therapy in a real world survey.

Authors:  Timo Aschenbrenner; Johannes Brockmeier; Peter Bramlage; Rolf Fimmers; Alessandro Cuneo; Stefan Hochreuther; Claudia Zemmrich; Ulrich Tebbe
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-07-27

10.  Patient preferences regarding device reuse and potential of devices for reuse - a study in a veteran population.

Authors:  Indiresha R Iyer; Judith Mackall
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2013-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.