Literature DB >> 11523697

Magnitude of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation is associated with important and seemingly opposite biological responses in breast cancer cells.

C E Clay1, A M Namen, G Atsumi, A J Trimboli, A N Fonteh, K P High, F H Chilton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) has become a potential target for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. However, recent in vitro and in vivo studies have raised the question of whether activation of PPARgamma leads to the promotion or reduction of tumor formation. Studies using several cancer cell lines, animal models, and a variety of PPARgamma agonists have shown discordant results, including changes in cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of cancer cells and tumors.
METHODS: We studied the effects of low-, moderate-, and high-dose treatment of the PPARgamma ligands 15-deoxy-delta1214 prostaglandin J2 (15dPGJ2) and troglitazone (TGZ) on parameters of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis in the epithelial breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231.
RESULTS: The biologic effects of these compounds depend largely on ligand concentration and the degree of PPARgamma activation. For example, low concentrations of 15dPGJ2 (<2.5 microM) and TGZ (<5 microM) increased cellular proliferation, but concentrations of 15dPGJ2 > or = 10 microM and of TGZ at 100 microM blocked cell growth. TGZ (100 microM) slowed cell cycle progression, and 15dPGJ2 (10 microM) caused an S-phase arrest in the cell cycle and induced morphological characteristics consistent with apoptosis. Expression of CD36, a marker of differentiation in these cells, was induced by 2.5 microM 15dPGJ2 or 5 to 100 microM TGZ. However, higher concentrations of 15dPGJ2 did not alter CD36 expression. Transcriptional activation studies demonstrated that 15dPGJ2 is a more potent PPARgamma ligand than TGZ. Regardless of the ligand used, though, low transcriptional activation correlated with an increased cellular proliferation, whereas higher levels of activation correlated with cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.
CONCLUSIONS: PPARgamma activation induces several important and seemingly opposite changes in neoplastic cells, depending on the magnitude of PPARgamma activation. These data may explain, at least in part, some of the discordant results previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523697     DOI: 10.2310/6650.2001.33786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Med        ISSN: 1081-5589            Impact factor:   2.895


  19 in total

1.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligand MCC-555 suppresses intestinal polyps in ApcMin/+ mice via extracellular signal-regulated kinase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-dependent pathways.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Yamaguchi; Maria Cekanova; Michael F McEntee; Joo-Heon Yoon; Susan M Fischer; Ingrid B Renes; Isabelle Van Seuningen; Seung Joon Baek
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  PPARgamma ligands inhibit primary tumor growth and metastasis by inhibiting angiogenesis.

Authors:  Dipak Panigrahy; Samuel Singer; Lucy Q Shen; Catherine E Butterfield; Deborah A Freedman; Emy J Chen; Marsha A Moses; Susan Kilroy; Stefan Duensing; Christopher Fletcher; Jonathan A Fletcher; Lynn Hlatky; Philip Hahnfeldt; Judah Folkman; Arja Kaipainen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  15-Deoxy-delta12,14-PGJ2: endogenous PPARgamma ligand or minor eicosanoid degradation product?

Authors:  William S Powell
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is essential in the pathogenesis of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiu-Mei Ma; Hong Yu; Na Huai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Differential effects of PPARgamma activation by the oral antidiabetic agent pioglitazone in Barrett's carcinoma in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Oliver H Al-Taie; Tilmann Graf; Bertram Illert; Tiemo Katzenberger; Hubert Mörk; Michael R Kraus; Hans U Barthelmes; Michael Scheurlen; Jochen Seufert
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  PPAR gamma signaling exacerbates mammary gland tumor development.

Authors:  Enrique Saez; John Rosenfeld; Antonia Livolsi; Peter Olson; Eleuterio Lombardo; Michael Nelson; Ester Banayo; Robert D Cardiff; Juan Carlos Izpisua-Belmonte; Ronald M Evans
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Rat Urinary Bladder Carcinogenesis by Dual-Acting PPARalpha + gamma Agonists.

Authors:  Martin B Oleksiewicz; Jennifer Southgate; Lars Iversen; Frederikke L Egerod
Journal:  PPAR Res       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Prognostic and therapeutic potential of nuclear receptors in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Shirley K Knauer
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Down-regulation of PPARgamma1 suppresses cell growth and induces apoptosis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Yekaterina Y Zaytseva; Xin Wang; R Chase Southard; Natalie K Wallis; Michael W Kilgore
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  GW9662, a potent antagonist of PPARgamma, inhibits growth of breast tumour cells and promotes the anticancer effects of the PPARgamma agonist rosiglitazone, independently of PPARgamma activation.

Authors:  Jill M Seargent; Elisabeth A Yates; Jason H Gill
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.