Literature DB >> 11523570

Information about occupational exposure to asbestos given to cases in an etiological study: ethical aspects.

A E Pujolar1, C González, A Agudo, A Calleja, M Beltrán, J González-Moya, S Hernandez, R Panades, J Ramirez, D Turuguet.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to consider some ethical aspects of the provision of information, to the cases or their families, about the assessment of occupational asbestos exposure obtained in a case-control study of malignant mesothelioma of the pleura. An informative letter with the result of the evaluation of their occupational exposure to asbestos was sent to the participating cases (and/or their family). Those whose exposure was classified as certain/probable were also informed of the legislation regarding occupational diseases. Of the 132 cases, 32.6% of subjects and/or their families made telephone calls expressing interest in the content of the informative letter. Among the 63 cases classified as certain/probable exposure, this proportion was 47.6%. Out of 43 cases in which the age at diagnosis was < or = 65 years and the exposure to asbestos was certain/probable, only two (4.6%) were signed off work owing to occupational disease. Only one of the mesothelioma cases was recognized by the Spanish National Institute for Social Security (INSS) as having an occupational disease. The process of communication of the results of an epidemiological research should include the provision of information on the exposure data to each one of the subjects, and/or their families. There is a great disparity between the number of cases of certain/probable exposure to asbestos identified in our study, and the number registered as an occupational disease by the INSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523570     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010926807569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  15 in total

1.  The epidemiologist's responsibilities to research subjects in the occupational setting.

Authors:  W E Thar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Epidemiology: questions of science, ethics, morality, and law.

Authors:  C L Soskolne
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Asbestos--still a carcinogen.

Authors:  P J Landrigan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-05-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  [Ethical principles of medical research].

Authors:  J Villar
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.725

6.  Can social injustice be compensated adequately?

Authors:  L Tomatis
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.901

7.  [Preliminary notes on the definition of several ethics guidelines in environmental epidemiology].

Authors:  P Lauriola; C Cislaghi; C Botti; C Magnani; R Satolli; P Vineis
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 8.  Ethical and legal issues in genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  N A Holtzman; L B Andrews
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Ethics of ignorance: lessons from the epidemiological assessment of the bovine spongioform encephalopathy ("mad cow disease") epidemic.

Authors:  A Morabia; M Porta
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.416

10.  Multicentric study on malignant pleural mesothelioma and non-occupational exposure to asbestos.

Authors:  C Magnani; A Agudo; C A González; A Andrion; A Calleja; E Chellini; P Dalmasso; A Escolar; S Hernandez; C Ivaldi; D Mirabelli; J Ramirez; D Turuguet; M Usel; B Terracini
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.