Literature DB >> 11523256

Study on modification of the Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section.

M Li1, L Zou, J Zhu.   

Abstract

172 cases of pregnant women scheduled for delivery by cesarean section were randomly assigned to 59 cases in modification group with modified Misgav Ladach technique, 57 cases in Misgav Ladach group with Misgav Ladach technique and 56 cases in Pfannenstiel group with Pfannenstiel technique from May to Dec. 1999. The modified points included: transversely incising the fascia 2 to 3 cm, then dividing it bluntly; without opening and dissociating the visceral peritoneum; two layers suturing of low transverse uterine incision; closing the skin by continuous suturing. Results showed the average delivery time in the modification group was (3.6 +/- 2.6) min and (5.7 +/- 2.9) min in the Misgav Ladach group (P < 0.05). Median operating time was (28.3 +/- 5.4) min in modification group compared with (27.5 +/- 6.5) min in the Misgav Ladach group (P > 0.05). Average blood loss was (128 +/- 35) ml in modification group compared with (212 +/- 147) ml in the Pfannenstiel group (P < 0.05). It was concluded that the modified Misgav Ladach technique not only preserved all advantages of Misgav Ladach method, but also had additional advantages, such as faster in delivering the fetus, less damage, easier mastering for obstetricians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11523256     DOI: 10.1007/BF02888044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ        ISSN: 0257-716X


  8 in total

1.  The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description.

Authors:  G Holmgren; L Sjöholm; M Stark
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Introduction of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section at an African tertiary centre: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K Björklund; M Kimaro; E Urassa; G Lindmark
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Cesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method.

Authors:  D Federici; B Lacelli; L Muggiasca; A Agarossi; L Cipolla; M Conti
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 4.  Cesarean section birth and cesarean hysterectomy.

Authors:  E R Baker; M E D'Alton
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Extraabdominal uterine exteriorization at cesarean section.

Authors:  D W Hershey; E J Quilligan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery.

Authors:  G Wallin; O Fall
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-03

Review 7.  Nonfatal venous air embolism during cesarean section: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  I P Lowenwirt; D S Chi; S M Handwerker
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.347

8.  Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers.

Authors:  J C Hauth; J Owen; R O Davis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.661

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Techniques for caesarean section.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M Mathai; A Shah; N Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

2.  Added value of surgical interdisciplinarity- The Joel-Cohen's abdominal incision.

Authors:  Michael Stark; Kai Witzel; Tahar Benhidjeb; Sven Becker
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.