Literature DB >> 11521703

Minimally invasive reduction and osteosynthesis of articular fractures of the humeral head.

H Resch1, C Hübner, R Schwaiger.   

Abstract

Percutaneous reduction and fixation of severe humeral head fractures would be the treatment of choice since it will not increase the risk of necrosis already inherent in these fractures. Nevertheless, the question arises of whether anatomical reduction is possible with the percutaneous technique and whether the reduced fracture can be adequately stabilized. It is important to study the fracture closely before the operation in order to determine the fracture type and identify the relationship of the individual fragments to each other. Radiographs taken in at least two planes are essential and a CT scan with 3D reconstruction would be desirable. Besides extraarticular fractures, surgical neck fractures with avulsion of the greater tuberosity (B1 and B2 fractures) and valgus impacted fractures (C1 and C2 fractures) are good indications for this method due to the fact that in these cases intact connections to rotator cuff tendons or remnants of intact periosteum between fragments still exist. Less good indications are fractures with severe lateral displacement of the articular segment and severely displaced fracture dislocations (C2 and C3 fractures). From 1990 to 1999, a total of 88 patients with 37 B1 and B2 fractures and 41 C1 and C2 fractures were operated on percutaneously. The initial 27 patients with 9 B1 and B2 and 18 C1 and C2 fractures were followed up. All B1 and B2 fractures showed good to very good functional results (Constant Score 91%). The Constant Score of the C1 and C2 fractures was 87%. The necrosis rate of the C1 and C2 fractures was 11%. In conclusion, it can be said that the presence of soft tissue bridging of the various fragments is crucial for the reduction to gain benefit from the ligamentotaxis effect. Thus, fractures such as valgus impacted or three-part fractures are very good indications for this technique. It can also be stated that the necrosis rate is low or at least not increased compared to cases treated by open reduction. Since the fracture is not exposed, adhesion within the surrounding gliding surfaces is reduced and the rehabilitation period is shorter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11521703     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00058-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  27 in total

1.  [Treatment of proximal humeral fractures in Germany: Influence of the level of hospital care and the frequency of treatment].

Authors:  A Tepass; K Weise; B Rolauffs; G Blumenstock; C Bahrs
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Da Vinci System: clinical experience with complex proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Raffaele Russo; Valeria Visconti; Luigi Vernaglia Lombardi; Michele Ciccarelli; Fabio Cautiero
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2010-05

3.  [Proximal humerus fracture: new aspects in epidemiology, fracture morphology, and diagnostics].

Authors:  C Hirzinger; M Tauber; H Resch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Craig S Mauro
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 5.  Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  Ralph Hertel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  [Angle-stable intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus fractures with the PHN (proximal humeral nail)].

Authors:  Jochen Blum; Matthias Hansen; Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Functional outcome following proximal humeral interlocking system plating for displaced proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  David S Thyagarajan; Samarth J Haridas; Denise Jones; Colin Dent; Richard Evans; Rhys Williams
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2009-07

8.  Long-term results after non-plate head-preserving fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Andreas Badke; Bernd Rolauffs; Kuno Weise; Sebastian Zipplies; Klaus Dietz; Christoph Eingartner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Comparison between reverse shoulder arthroplasty and Humerusblock in three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Reinhold Ortmaier; Georg Mattiassich; Matthias Pumberger; Wolfgang Hitzl; Philipp Moroder; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Does fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis solve the problems of a fractured proximal humerus? A prospective series of 87 patients.

Authors:  Peter Helwig; Christian Bahrs; Björn Epple; Justus Oehm; Christoph Eingartner; Kuno Weise
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.