CONTEXT: False-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis have been found in nearly all DNA fingerprinting studies, but the effectiveness of interventions to reduce cross-contamination has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether changes in laboratory policies and procedures reduced the rate of false-positive cultures. DESIGN: Retrospective study of isolates with matching DNA fingerprints. SETTING: A mycobacteriology laboratory serving an urban tuberculosis control program and public hospital system. PATIENTS: All M tuberculosis isolates processed from July 1994 to December 1999. METHODS: Isolates were fingerprinted using IS6110; pTBN12 was used to fingerprint isolates having fewer than 6 copies of IS6110. We further evaluated all patients having only one positive culture whose DNA fingerprint matched that of another isolate processed in the laboratory within 42 days. INTERVENTIONS: We changed laboratory policy to reduce the number of smear-positive specimens processed and changed laboratory procedures to minimize the risk of cross-contamination during batch processing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of false-positive cultures. RESULTS: Of 13 940 specimens processed during the study period, 630 (4.5%) from 184 patients and 48 laboratory proficiency specimens grew M tuberculosis. There were no cases (0/184) of probable or definite cross-contamination, compared with the 4% rate (8/199) identified in our previous study (P =.008). We also fingerprinted a convenience sample of isolates from other laboratories in Denver; 13.6% (3/22) of these were false-positive, a rate similar to the 11.9% rate (5/42) identified for other laboratories in our previous study (P =.84). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory cross-contamination decreased significantly after relatively simple, inexpensive changes in laboratory policies and practices. Cross-contamination continued to occur in other laboratories in Denver.
CONTEXT: False-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis have been found in nearly all DNA fingerprinting studies, but the effectiveness of interventions to reduce cross-contamination has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether changes in laboratory policies and procedures reduced the rate of false-positive cultures. DESIGN: Retrospective study of isolates with matching DNA fingerprints. SETTING: A mycobacteriology laboratory serving an urban tuberculosis control program and public hospital system. PATIENTS: All M tuberculosis isolates processed from July 1994 to December 1999. METHODS: Isolates were fingerprinted using IS6110; pTBN12 was used to fingerprint isolates having fewer than 6 copies of IS6110. We further evaluated all patients having only one positive culture whose DNA fingerprint matched that of another isolate processed in the laboratory within 42 days. INTERVENTIONS: We changed laboratory policy to reduce the number of smear-positive specimens processed and changed laboratory procedures to minimize the risk of cross-contamination during batch processing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of false-positive cultures. RESULTS: Of 13 940 specimens processed during the study period, 630 (4.5%) from 184 patients and 48 laboratory proficiency specimens grew M tuberculosis. There were no cases (0/184) of probable or definite cross-contamination, compared with the 4% rate (8/199) identified in our previous study (P =.008). We also fingerprinted a convenience sample of isolates from other laboratories in Denver; 13.6% (3/22) of these were false-positive, a rate similar to the 11.9% rate (5/42) identified for other laboratories in our previous study (P =.84). CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory cross-contamination decreased significantly after relatively simple, inexpensive changes in laboratory policies and practices. Cross-contamination continued to occur in other laboratories in Denver.
Authors: David A J Moore; Luz Caviedes; Robert H Gilman; Jorge Coronel; Fanny Arenas; Doris LaChira; Cayo Salazar; Juan Carlos Saravia; Richard A Oberhelman; Maria-Graciela Hollm-Delgado; A Roderick Escombe; Carlton A W Evans; Jon S Friedland Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2006-05-06 Impact factor: 2.803