H Sangi-Haghpeykar1, F Horth, A N Poindexter. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Contraceptive Research and Development, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. halehs@bcm.tmc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women who use sterilization for contraception are at risk for various sexually transmitted diseases, unless they use a barrier method. Use of condoms is significantly lower among sterilized women than among hormonal-contraceptive users. Among Hispanics, women's perception of risk and the influence of male partners are strong correlates of dual-method use. Limited data are available concerning use of condoms among sterilized women, in particular among Hispanics. GOALS: Past and future use of condoms was examined and compared among 224 sterilized women and 104 hormonal-contraceptive users of Hispanic origin, and the reasons for use or nonuse of condoms were examined. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: As compared with hormonal-contraceptive users, sterilized women were significantly less likely to have used condoms in the 3 months before the study or to have plans to use them in the future (P < 0.001). Despite similarities between various HIV-related characteristics of sterilized and nonsterilized women, the former group had significantly lower perceptions of being at risk for both HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sterilized women were also more likely to have used condoms for the purposes of dual protection from pregnancy. The strongest correlates of consistent condom use by both sterilized and nonsterilized Hispanic women were their perceived susceptibility to disease, male partners' positive opinion about condoms, and the women's ability to use condoms in long-term relationships. Furthermore, the practice of concealing the use of a contraceptive from a male partner was not uncommon, although this characteristic was not related to increased dual-method use. CONCLUSIONS: Sterilized women may be at a higher risk of disease than hormonal-contraceptive users. Among Hispanics, women's perception of risk and male partners' influences predict whether the women protect themselves from pregnancy and disease simultaneously.
BACKGROUND:Women who use sterilization for contraception are at risk for various sexually transmitted diseases, unless they use a barrier method. Use of condoms is significantly lower among sterilized women than among hormonal-contraceptive users. Among Hispanics, women's perception of risk and the influence of male partners are strong correlates of dual-method use. Limited data are available concerning use of condoms among sterilized women, in particular among Hispanics. GOALS: Past and future use of condoms was examined and compared among 224 sterilized women and 104 hormonal-contraceptive users of Hispanic origin, and the reasons for use or nonuse of condoms were examined. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: As compared with hormonal-contraceptive users, sterilized women were significantly less likely to have used condoms in the 3 months before the study or to have plans to use them in the future (P < 0.001). Despite similarities between various HIV-related characteristics of sterilized and nonsterilized women, the former group had significantly lower perceptions of being at risk for both HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sterilized women were also more likely to have used condoms for the purposes of dual protection from pregnancy. The strongest correlates of consistent condom use by both sterilized and nonsterilized Hispanic women were their perceived susceptibility to disease, male partners' positive opinion about condoms, and the women's ability to use condoms in long-term relationships. Furthermore, the practice of concealing the use of a contraceptive from a male partner was not uncommon, although this characteristic was not related to increased dual-method use. CONCLUSIONS: Sterilized women may be at a higher risk of disease than hormonal-contraceptive users. Among Hispanics, women's perception of risk and male partners' influences predict whether the women protect themselves from pregnancy and disease simultaneously.
Authors: Jenny A Higgins; Nicole K Smith; Stephanie A Sanders; Vanessa Schick; Debby Herbenick; Michael Reece; Brian Dodge; J Dennis Fortenberry Journal: Contraception Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 3.375