Literature DB >> 11518306

Tail-docking alters fly numbers, fly-avoidance behaviors, and cleanliness, but not physiological measures.

S D Eicher1, J L Morrow-Tesch, J L Albright, R E Williams.   

Abstract

Tail docking is an animal well-being issue not only regarding the docking procedures but also because of concerns during fly season. To address the latter question, we selected eight cows that had been tail-docked in a previous experiment and eight nondocked cows matched by stage of lactation. Physiological, immunological, and behavioral measures were used to evaluate the well being of those cows housed in a tie-stall barn during fly season for 5 consecutive days. Behavior was observed for 5-min interval instantaneous scan samples for 1 h each at 0800, 1200, and 1600 h. Flies were counted before behavior observations. Blood samples were taken daily for plasma and leukocyte separation. Cows were scored on d 5 for cleanliness on a five-point scale. Docked cows were cleaner, but fly counts of docked cows were greater for total fly counts and rear leg counts. However, counts were not different on front legs. Time of day was significant, so each time of day was analyzed separately. Docked cows were observed to exhibit fewer tail swings at 0800 h, but docked cows tended to ruminate more at that time. Docked cows tended to stand less at the 1200 h observation. Total fly-avoidance behaviors were greater for all cows at the 1600-h observation. Only tail swings tended to be more frequent with docked cows, but foot stomps occurred only in the docked cows. Lymphocyte phenotypes, acute-phase proteins, and immunoglobulin concentrations did not differ. In conclusion, although docked cows were cleaner, as the fly numbers increase throughout the day, fly-avoidance behaviors also increased and foot stomping appeared as an alternative method for fly avoidance by docked cows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11518306     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74621-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of contagious and environmental mastitis-causing bacteria in bulk tank milk and its relationships with milking practices of dairy cattle herds in São Miguel Island (Azores).

Authors:  Carla Azevedo; Diana Pacheco; Luísa Soares; Ricardo Romão; Mónica Moitoso; Jaime Maldonado; Roger Guix; João Simões
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Risk of introduction of lumpy skin disease in France by the import of vectors in animal trucks.

Authors:  Claude Saegerman; Stéphane Bertagnoli; Gilles Meyer; Jean-Pierre Ganière; Philippe Caufour; Kris De Clercq; Philippe Jacquiet; Guillaume Fournié; Claire Hautefeuille; Florence Etore; Jordi Casal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Scientific Opinion on the welfare of cattle kept for beef production and the welfare in intensive calf farming systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2012-05-15

4.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09

5.  Cows painted with zebra-like striping can avoid biting fly attack.

Authors:  Tomoki Kojima; Kazato Oishi; Yasushi Matsubara; Yuki Uchiyama; Yoshihiko Fukushima; Naoto Aoki; Say Sato; Tatsuaki Masuda; Junichi Ueda; Hiroyuki Hirooka; Katsutoshi Kino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mechanical/thermal sensitivity and superficial temperature in the stump of long-term tail-docked dairy cows.

Authors:  Renata J Troncoso; Daniel E Herzberg; Constanza S Meneses; Heine Y Müller; Marianne P Werner; Hedie Bustamante
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.