Literature DB >> 11518205

Interaction of swine nursery and grow-finish space allocations on performance.

M C Brumm1, M Ellis, L J Johnston, D W Rozeboom, D R Zimmerman.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the possible interaction of nursery space allocations and grow-finish space allocations in swine. In Exp. 1, crowding was achieved by varying the number of pigs per pen. During the nursery phase, decreasing the space allocation (0.16 m2/pig vs 0.25 m2/pig; 8 and 12 pens per treatment, respectively) by increasing the number of pigs per pen (18 vs 12) resulted in a decrease in daily feed intake (0.609 vs 0.683 kg/d; P < 0.001) and daily gain (0.364 vs 0.408 kg/d; P < 0.001). Pigs were mixed within nursery treatment groups and reassigned to grow-finish pens (6 pens per treatment) at the end of the 35-d nursery period providing either 0.56 m2/pig (14 pigs/pen) or 0.78 m2/pig (10 pigs/pen). Crowding during the grow-finish phase decreased daily feed intake (P < 0.003) and daily gain (P < 0.001). In Exp. 2, space allocations of 0.16 m2/pig vs 0.23 m2/pig during the nursery phase (24 pens per treatment) resulted in a decrease in daily feed intake (0.612 vs 0.654 kg/d; P < 0.005) and daily gain (0.403 vs 0.430 kg/d; P < 0.001). Pigs remained in the same (social) groups when moved to the grow-finish phase. Unlike Exp. 1, there was no effect of crowding during the grow-finish phase (0.60 m2/pig vs 0. 74 m2/pig) on daily feed intake or daily gain. The difference in results between experiments suggests that the response to crowding during the grow-finish phase may depend in part on whether pigs are mixed and sorted following movement from the nursery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11518205     DOI: 10.2527/2001.7981967x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Effect of floor space allowances on growth performance of finishing pigs marketed at 138 kilograms.

Authors:  L J Johnston; D W Rozeboom; R D Goodband; S J Moeller; M C Shannon; S J Schieck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of vitamin levels and different stocking densities on performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood characteristics of growing pigs.

Authors:  Z F Zhang; J Li; J C Park; I H Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Strategies to improve the growth and homogeneity of growing-finishing pigs: feeder space and feeding management.

Authors:  Sergi López-Vergé; Josep Gasa; Déborah Temple; Jordi Bonet; Jaume Coma; David Solà-Oriol
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-07-02

4.  Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds.

Authors:  Birgitte Ask; Lizette Vestergaard Pedersen; Ole Fredslund Christensen; Hanne Marie Nielsen; Simon P Turner; Bjarne Nielsen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Effects of different space allowances on growth performance, blood profile and pork quality in a grow-to-finish production system.

Authors:  J C Jang; X H Jin; J S Hong; Y Y Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.509

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.