Literature DB >> 11517719

Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: a review.

T Ucar1, F R Hall.   

Abstract

The use of natural and artificial barriers to mitigate pesticide drift from agricultural and forest applications is discussed. This technique has been considered as an alternative to current methods at a time when environmental concerns are under great public scrutiny. There has been a variety of research experiments on this subject from New Zealand to The Netherlands which have documented reductions in spray drift of up to 80-90%. However, there are still enormous data gaps to utilize this method accurately. The aerodynamic factors of wind barriers and shelter effects on crop growth and yield have been well investigated. In contrast, some of the important aspects of drift mitigation, e.g. porosity and turbulence, have been difficult to obtain and no standard methodologies are currently available to evaluate and classify windbreaks and shelterbelts or to determine their efficiency in reducing drift. Thus there is a significant opportunity to incorporate windbreaks into the tool set of drift mitigation tactics. Government policies, initiatives, legislation, etc, which currently address water quality, BMP, stewardship, buffers, etc, are issues which so far have not included windbreaks as a valuable drift mitigation strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11517719     DOI: 10.1002/ps.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  5 in total

1.  Strategies for reducing airborne pesticides under tropical conditions.

Authors:  Tomaz Langenbach; Luiz Querino Caldas
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Ecological and historical factors behind the spatial structure of the historical field patterns in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Václav Fanta; Jaromír Beneš; Jan Zouhar; Volha Rakava; Ivana Šitnerová; Kristina Janečková Molnárová; Ladislav Šmejda; Petr Sklenicka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination.

Authors:  Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki; Anahí Espíndola; Adam J Vanbergen; Josef Settele; Claire Kremen; Lynn V Dicks
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Exposure and risk assessment of acetamiprid in honey bee colonies under a real exposure scenario in Eucalyptus sp. landscapes.

Authors:  Nuno Capela; Mang Xu; Sandra Simões; Henrique M S V Azevedo-Pereira; Jeroen Peters; José Paulo Sousa
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 10.753

5.  Deposition of dust with active substances in pesticides from treated seeds in adjacent fields during drilling: disentangling the effects of various factors using an 8-year field experiment.

Authors:  André Krahner; Udo Heimbach; Matthias Stähler; Gabriela Bischoff; Jens Pistorius
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.