OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the positive predictive value of impaired evacuation during evacuation proctography for the subsequent diagnosis of anismus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one adults with signs of impaired evacuation (defined as the inability to evacuate two thirds of a 120 mL contrast enema within 30 sec) during evacuation proctography underwent subsequent anorectal physiologic testing for anismus. A physiologic diagnosis of anismus was based on a typical clinical history of the condition combined with impaired rectal balloon expulsion or abnormal surface electromyogram. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (90%) of the 31 patients with impaired proctographic evacuation were found to have anismus at subsequent physiologic testing. Among the 28 were all 10 patients who evacuated no contrast medium and all 11 patients with inadequate pelvic floor descent, giving evacuation proctography a positive predictive value of 90% for the diagnosis of anismus. A prominent puborectal impression was seen in only three subjects during proctography, one of whom subsequently showed no physiologic sign of anismus. CONCLUSION: Impaired evacuation during evacuation proctography is highly predictive for diagnosis of anismus.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the positive predictive value of impaired evacuation during evacuation proctography for the subsequent diagnosis of anismus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one adults with signs of impaired evacuation (defined as the inability to evacuate two thirds of a 120 mL contrast enema within 30 sec) during evacuation proctography underwent subsequent anorectal physiologic testing for anismus. A physiologic diagnosis of anismus was based on a typical clinical history of the condition combined with impaired rectal balloon expulsion or abnormal surface electromyogram. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (90%) of the 31 patients with impaired proctographic evacuation were found to have anismus at subsequent physiologic testing. Among the 28 were all 10 patients who evacuated no contrast medium and all 11 patients with inadequate pelvic floor descent, giving evacuation proctography a positive predictive value of 90% for the diagnosis of anismus. A prominent puborectal impression was seen in only three subjects during proctography, one of whom subsequently showed no physiologic sign of anismus. CONCLUSION: Impaired evacuation during evacuation proctography is highly predictive for diagnosis of anismus.
Authors: P V Foti; R Farina; G Riva; M Coronella; E Fisichella; S Palmucci; A Racalbuto; G Politi; G C Ettorre Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Alison J Hainsworth; Sophie A Pilkington; Catherine Grierson; Elizabeth Rutherford; Alexis M P Schizas; Karen P Nugent; Andrew B Williams Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Nadine C Kassis; John M Wo; Toyia N James-Stevenson; Dean D T Maglinte; Michael H Heit; Douglass S Hale Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Ugo Grossi; Emma V Carrington; Adil E Bharucha; Emma J Horrocks; S Mark Scott; Charles H Knowles Journal: Gut Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 23.059